PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RINC vs. TARK
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

RINC vs. TARK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AXS Real Estate Income ETF (RINC) and Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF (TARK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

RINC vs. TARK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
RINC
AXS Real Estate Income ETF
0.00%7.75%-5.74%1.71%
TARK
Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF
-27.41%41.00%-4.85%50.52%

Returns By Period


RINC

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TARK

1D
12.58%
1M
-16.10%
YTD
-27.41%
6M
-45.62%
1Y
56.77%
3Y*
11.75%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


RINC vs. TARK - Expense Ratio Comparison

RINC has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is lower than TARK's 1.15% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

RINC vs. TARK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RINC

TARK
TARK Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
TARK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TARK Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
TARK Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
TARK Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
TARK Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RINC vs. TARK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AXS Real Estate Income ETF (RINC) and Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF (TARK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

RINC vs. TARK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RINCTARKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.15

Correlation

The correlation between RINC and TARK is 0.41, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

RINC vs. TARK - Dividend Comparison

RINC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.60%, less than TARK's 41.32% yield.


TTM202520242023
RINC
AXS Real Estate Income ETF
3.60%6.04%10.85%3.88%
TARK
Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF
41.32%30.00%0.59%0.00%

Drawdowns

RINC vs. TARK - Drawdown Comparison


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


RINCTARKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-57.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-52.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-51.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

24.38%

Volatility

RINC vs. TARK - Volatility Comparison


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


RINCTARKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

25.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

54.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

84.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

91.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

91.55%