RINC vs. QQQI

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

RINC (AXS Real Estate Income ETF) and QQQI (NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RINC is a REIT fund tracking the Gapstow Real Estate Income Index, while QQQI is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Neos. RINC is passively managed, while QQQI is actively managed. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RINC charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for QQQI.

Performance

RINC vs. QQQI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AXS Real Estate Income ETF (RINC) and NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

RINC

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QQQI

• 1D: -0.17%
• 1M: 6.91%
• YTD: 13.43%
• 6M: 12.92%
• 1Y: 30.41%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RINC vs. QQQI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
RINC AXS Real Estate Income ETF	0.00%	7.75%	-4.01%
QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF	13.43%	18.62%	19.83%

Correlation

The correlation between RINC and QQQI is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.08
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2024	0.26

The correlation between RINC and QQQI shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (1 year) to 0.26 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

RINC vs. QQQI - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	RINC	QQQI
Real Estate	100.0%	0.1%
Basic Materials	-	1.2%
Communication Services	-	15.7%
Consumer Cyclical	-	12.1%
Consumer Defensive	-	7.7%
Energy	-	0.7%
Financial Services	-	0.3%
Healthcare	-	4.3%
Industrials	-	3.3%
Technology	-	53.3%
Utilities	-	1.5%

Return for Risk

RINC vs. QQQI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQI

QQQI Risk / Return Rank: 68
QQQI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
QQQI Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
QQQI Omega Ratio Rank: 70
QQQI Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
QQQI Martin Ratio Rank: 74

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RINC vs. QQQI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AXS Real Estate Income ETF (RINC) and NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RINC	QQQI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.35	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	1.34	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	RINC	QQQI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-20.00%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-9.61%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-0.17%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-2.20%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.14%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	RINC	QQQI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	2.68%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	9.85%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	12.98%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	17.07%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	17.07%	—

RINC vs. QQQI - Expense Ratio Comparison

RINC has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQI's 0.68% expense ratio.

Dividends

RINC vs. QQQI - Dividend Comparison

RINC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.16%, less than QQQI's 13.19% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF	13.19%	13.82%	12.85%	0.00%
RINC AXS Real Estate Income ETF	2.16%	6.04%	10.85%	3.88%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RINC and QQQI in my portfolio?

RINC and QQQI have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, RINC or QQQI?

On fees, QQQI is cheaper at 0.68% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, RINC or QQQI?

QQQI is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for RINC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RINC or QQQI?

QQQI has the higher dividend yield at 13.19%, compared with 2.16% for RINC.

What is the main difference between RINC and QQQI?

RINC is categorized as REIT, while QQQI is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: AXS and Neos. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for RINC and 0.68% for QQQI.