RILA vs. QWLD

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

RILA (Indexperts Gorilla Aggressive Growth ETF) and QWLD (SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. RILA is actively managed, while QWLD is passively managed. Over the past year, RILA returned 12.73% vs 17.09% for QWLD. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RILA charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for QWLD.

Performance

RILA vs. QWLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Indexperts Gorilla Aggressive Growth ETF (RILA) and SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF (QWLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RILA achieves a 5.54% return, which is significantly lower than QWLD's 6.55% return.

RILA

• 1D: -1.28%
• 1M: 7.26%
• YTD: 5.54%
• 6M: 4.59%
• 1Y: 12.73%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QWLD

• 1D: -0.56%
• 1M: 2.55%
• YTD: 6.55%
• 6M: 7.32%
• 1Y: 17.09%
• 3Y*: 16.35%
• 5Y*: 9.96%
• 10Y*: 11.68%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RILA vs. QWLD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
RILA Indexperts Gorilla Aggressive Growth ETF	5.54%	15.46%
QWLD SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF	6.55%	18.22%

Correlation

The correlation between RILA and QWLD is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.68
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2025	0.72

The correlation between RILA and QWLD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

RILA vs. QWLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RILA

RILA Risk / Return Rank: 22
RILA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
RILA Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
RILA Omega Ratio Rank: 23
RILA Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
RILA Martin Ratio Rank: 20

QWLD

QWLD Risk / Return Rank: 50
QWLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
QWLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
QWLD Omega Ratio Rank: 49
QWLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
QWLD Martin Ratio Rank: 55

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RILA vs. QWLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Indexperts Gorilla Aggressive Growth ETF (RILA) and SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF (QWLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RILA	QWLD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.81	1.77	-0.96
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.22	2.55	-1.33
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	1.31	-0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.77	2.24	-1.47
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.32	9.70	-7.38
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RILA vs. QWLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RILA Sharpe Ratio is 0.81, which is lower than the QWLD Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RILA and QWLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RILA	QWLD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.81	1.77	-0.96
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.74	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.77	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.75	0.69	+0.05

Drawdowns

RILA vs. QWLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RILA drawdown since its inception was -19.99%, smaller than the maximum QWLD drawdown of -31.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RILA and QWLD.

Drawdown Indicators

	RILA	QWLD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.99%	-31.89%	+11.90%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.54%	-7.66%	-8.88%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-12.40%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-22.84%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-31.89%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.40%	-0.56%	-0.84%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.52%	-3.71%	-0.81%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.51%	1.77%	+3.74%

Volatility

RILA vs. QWLD - Volatility Comparison

Indexperts Gorilla Aggressive Growth ETF (RILA) has a higher volatility of 3.98% compared to SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF (QWLD) at 2.26%. This indicates that RILA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QWLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RILA	QWLD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.98%	2.26%	+1.72%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.98%	7.51%	+4.47%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.78%	9.68%	+6.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.24%	13.53%	+6.71%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.24%	15.18%	+5.06%

RILA vs. QWLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

RILA has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than QWLD's 0.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

RILA vs. QWLD - Dividend Comparison

RILA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.10%, less than QWLD's 1.84% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
QWLD SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF	1.84%	1.85%	1.74%	1.78%	2.02%	1.77%	1.77%	2.13%	2.33%	2.73%	2.22%	3.42%
RILA Indexperts Gorilla Aggressive Growth ETF	0.10%	0.08%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RILA and QWLD in my portfolio?

RILA and QWLD have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RILA or QWLD?

RILA has higher volatility (3.98%) compared to QWLD (2.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RILA dropped -19.99% vs QWLD's -31.89%.

Which ETF is better, RILA or QWLD?

On 1-year performance, QWLD leads with 17.09% vs 12.73% for RILA. On fees, QWLD is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, QWLD has been the lower-risk option at 2.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RILA or QWLD?

Over the 1-year period, QWLD has performed better with a 17.09% return vs 12.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RILA or QWLD?

QWLD is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for RILA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RILA or QWLD?

QWLD has the higher dividend yield at 1.84%, compared with 0.10% for RILA.

What is the main difference between RILA and QWLD?

They also come from different issuers: Indexperts and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for RILA and 0.30% for QWLD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QWLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs 0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.