PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RILA vs. AVUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RILA vs. AVUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Indexperts Gorilla Aggressive Growth ETF (RILA) and Avantis U.S. Equity ETF (AVUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RILA achieves a 2.63% return, which is significantly lower than AVUS's 14.87% return.


RILA

1D
-0.61%
1M
0.82%
YTD
2.63%
6M
0.84%
1Y
10.89%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AVUS

1D
0.11%
1M
1.87%
YTD
14.87%
6M
14.04%
1Y
32.84%
3Y*
22.02%
5Y*
13.28%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RILA vs. AVUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
RILA
Indexperts Gorilla Aggressive Growth ETF
2.63%13.77%
AVUS
Avantis U.S. Equity ETF
14.87%16.68%

Correlation

The correlation between RILA and AVUS is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2025

0.83

The correlation between RILA and AVUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RILA vs. AVUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RILA
RILA Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
RILA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RILA Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
RILA Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
RILA Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
RILA Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

AVUS
AVUS Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
AVUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVUS Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
AVUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVUS Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RILA vs. AVUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Indexperts Gorilla Aggressive Growth ETF (RILA) and Avantis U.S. Equity ETF (AVUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RILAAVUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.94

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.47

-0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.66

4.20

-3.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.96

18.77

-16.81

RILA vs. AVUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RILA Sharpe Ratio is 0.67, which is lower than the AVUS Sharpe Ratio of 2.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RILA and AVUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RILA vs. AVUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RILA drawdown since its inception was -19.99%, smaller than the maximum AVUS drawdown of -37.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RILA and AVUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RILAAVUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.99%

-37.04%

+17.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.54%

-7.85%

-8.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.12%

-0.51%

-3.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.50%

-5.06%

+0.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.58%

1.75%

+3.83%

Volatility

RILA vs. AVUS - Volatility Comparison

Indexperts Gorilla Aggressive Growth ETF (RILA) has a higher volatility of 5.97% compared to Avantis U.S. Equity ETF (AVUS) at 4.50%. This indicates that RILA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AVUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RILAAVUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.97%

4.50%

+1.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.69%

9.72%

+2.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.43%

12.66%

+3.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.33%

17.35%

+2.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.33%

20.83%

-0.50%

RILA vs. AVUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

RILA has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than AVUS's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

RILA vs. AVUS - Dividend Comparison

RILA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%, less than AVUS's 1.17% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
AVUS
Avantis U.S. Equity ETF
1.17%1.08%1.27%1.41%1.59%1.08%1.19%0.35%
RILA
Indexperts Gorilla Aggressive Growth ETF
0.11%0.08%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


RILA and AVUS have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RILA has higher volatility (5.97%) compared to AVUS (4.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RILA dropped -19.99% vs AVUS's -37.04%.

On 1-year performance, AVUS leads with 32.84% vs 10.89% for RILA. On fees, AVUS is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, AVUS has been the lower-risk option at 4.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AVUS has performed better with a 32.84% return vs 10.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AVUS is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for RILA.

AVUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.17%, compared with 0.11% for RILA.

RILA is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while AVUS is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Indexperts and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for RILA and 0.15% for AVUS.

AVUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RILA and AVUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer