RIIN.TO vs. CIF.TO
RIIN.TO (Russell Investments Global Infrastructure Pool) and CIF.TO (iShares Global Infrastructure Index ETF) are both Infrastructure Equities funds. RIIN.TO is actively managed, while CIF.TO is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, RIIN.TO returned 12.56%/yr vs 18.74%/yr for CIF.TO. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
RIIN.TO vs. CIF.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RIIN.TO achieves a 14.75% return, which is significantly lower than CIF.TO's 27.99% return.
RIIN.TO
- 1D
- 0.70%
- 1M
- 0.75%
- 6M
- 12.04%
- YTD
- 14.75%
- 1Y
- 19.41%
- 3Y*
- 16.20%
- 5Y*
- 12.56%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 8.74%
CIF.TO
- 1D
- -0.80%
- 1M
- -0.22%
- 6M
- 20.01%
- YTD
- 27.99%
- 1Y
- 32.27%
- 3Y*
- 24.86%
- 5Y*
- 18.74%
- 10Y*
- 12.88%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.92%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA$1.78M | CA$2.07M | CA$2.56M | |
| CA$83.70K | CA$81.11K | CA$107.94K |
RIIN.TO vs. CIF.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RIIN.TO Russell Investments Global Infrastructure Pool | 14.75% | 11.43% | 21.76% | 3.17% | 4.20% | 14.23% | -9.79% |
CIF.TO iShares Global Infrastructure Index ETF | 27.99% | 14.57% | 25.83% | 14.99% | 6.22% | 18.14% | -3.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between RIIN.TO and CIF.TO is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2020 | 0.38 |
The correlation between RIIN.TO and CIF.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.38 (all time) to 0.53 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RIIN.TO vs. CIF.TO — Risk / Return Rank
RIIN.TO
CIF.TO
RIIN.TO vs. CIF.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Russell Investments Global Infrastructure Pool (RIIN.TO) and iShares Global Infrastructure Index ETF (CIF.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RIIN.TO | CIF.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.38 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.70 | 3.42 | +0.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.38 | 12.08 | -3.71 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RIIN.TO vs. CIF.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RIIN.TO drawdown since its inception was -34.62%, smaller than the maximum CIF.TO drawdown of -45.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RIIN.TO and CIF.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RIIN.TO | CIF.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.62% | -45.41% | +10.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.27% | -9.49% | +4.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.21% | -20.33% | +10.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.40% | -20.33% | +6.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -45.41% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.75% | -0.88% | +0.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.60% | -9.69% | +4.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.32% | 2.68% | -0.36% |
Volatility
RIIN.TO vs. CIF.TO - Volatility Comparison
Russell Investments Global Infrastructure Pool (RIIN.TO) and iShares Global Infrastructure Index ETF (CIF.TO) have volatilities of 2.81% and 2.93%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RIIN.TO | CIF.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.81% | 2.93% | -0.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.18% | 11.70% | -3.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.33% | 15.62% | -5.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.76% | 15.16% | -2.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.67% | 25.96% | -10.29% |
Dividends
RIIN.TO vs. CIF.TO - Dividend Comparison
RIIN.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.39%, more than CIF.TO's 1.54% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIF.TO iShares Global Infrastructure Index ETF | 1.54% | 2.14% | 3.13% | 2.63% | 2.83% | 2.55% | 2.37% | 2.11% | 2.82% | 2.64% | 2.09% | 2.81% |
RIIN.TO Russell Investments Global Infrastructure Pool | 6.39% | 7.00% | 6.34% | 4.52% | 4.46% | 4.12% | 4.77% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RIIN.TO and CIF.TO have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
They also come from different issuers: Russell Investments Canada Limited and iShares.
Find the right allocation for RIIN.TO and CIF.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer