PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RIIN.TO vs. BHP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RIIN.TO vs. BHP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Russell Investments Global Infrastructure Pool (RIIN.TO) and BHP Group Limited (BHP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

RIIN.TO is traded in CAD, while BHP is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the BHP values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RIIN.TO achieves a 14.75% return, which is significantly lower than BHP's 45.51% return.


RIIN.TO

1D
0.70%
1M
0.75%
6M
12.04%
YTD
14.75%
1Y
19.41%
3Y*
16.20%
5Y*
12.56%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
8.74%

BHP

1D
0.13%
1M
2.86%
6M
29.26%
YTD
45.51%
1Y
67.16%
3Y*
17.15%
5Y*
16.86%
10Y*
21.54%
ALL TIME*
14.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CA$288.99MCA$276.84MCA$312.78M
CA$83.70KCA$81.11KCA$107.94K

RIIN.TO vs. BHP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
RIIN.TO
Russell Investments Global Infrastructure Pool
14.75%11.43%21.76%3.17%4.20%14.23%-9.79%
BHP
BHP Group Limited
45.51%23.02%-18.26%13.73%53.49%0.86%20.62%

Correlation

The correlation between RIIN.TO and BHP is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2020

0.13

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RIIN.TO vs. BHP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RIIN.TO
RIIN.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
RIIN.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RIIN.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
RIIN.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
RIIN.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
RIIN.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

BHP
BHP Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
BHP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BHP Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
BHP Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
BHP Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
BHP Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RIIN.TO vs. BHP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Russell Investments Global Infrastructure Pool (RIIN.TO) and BHP Group Limited (BHP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RIIN.TOBHPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.33

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.70

3.48

+0.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.38

11.58

-3.20

RIIN.TO vs. BHP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RIIN.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.89, which is comparable to the BHP Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RIIN.TO and BHP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RIIN.TO vs. BHP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RIIN.TO drawdown since its inception was -34.62%, smaller than the maximum BHP drawdown of -66.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RIIN.TO and BHP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RIIN.TOBHPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.62%

-66.03%

+31.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.27%

-19.40%

+14.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.21%

-32.25%

+22.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.40%

-32.25%

+18.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.75%

-8.84%

+8.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.60%

-17.27%

+11.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.32%

5.84%

-3.52%

Volatility

RIIN.TO vs. BHP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Russell Investments Global Infrastructure Pool (RIIN.TO) is 2.81%, while BHP Group Limited (BHP) has a volatility of 10.59%. This indicates that RIIN.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BHP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RIIN.TOBHPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.81%

10.59%

-7.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.18%

28.13%

-19.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.33%

32.91%

-22.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.76%

33.08%

-20.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.67%

32.79%

-17.12%

Dividends

RIIN.TO vs. BHP - Dividend Comparison

RIIN.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.39%, more than BHP's 3.18% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BHP
BHP Group Limited
3.18%3.64%5.98%4.98%22.44%9.98%3.67%8.59%4.89%3.61%1.68%9.38%
RIIN.TO
Russell Investments Global Infrastructure Pool
6.39%7.00%6.34%4.52%4.46%4.12%4.77%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


RIIN.TO and BHP have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RIIN.TO and BHP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer