CIF.TO vs. XDIV.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Global Infrastructure Index ETF (CIF.TO) and iShares Core MSCI Canadian Quality Dividend Index ETF (XDIV.TO).
CIF.TO and XDIV.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CIF.TO is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Manulife Investment Management Global Infrastructure Index. It was launched on Aug 27, 2008. XDIV.TO is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Canada High Dividend Yield 10% Security Capped Index. It was launched on Jun 12, 2017. Both CIF.TO and XDIV.TO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CIF.TO or XDIV.TO.
Key characteristics
| CIF.TO | XDIV.TO | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 33.91% | 24.40% |
| 1Y Return | 42.89% | 31.20% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 17.14% | 12.61% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 14.64% | 11.38% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 4.11 | 3.53 |
| Sortino Ratio | 5.97 | 4.99 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.79 | 1.67 |
| Calmar Ratio | 9.35 | 5.74 |
| Martin Ratio | 27.05 | 19.66 |
| Ulcer Index | 1.65% | 1.61% |
| Daily Std Dev | 10.81% | 8.98% |
| Max Drawdown | -42.37% | -41.29% |
| Current Drawdown | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between CIF.TO and XDIV.TO is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
CIF.TO vs. XDIV.TO - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, CIF.TO achieves a 33.91% return, which is significantly higher than XDIV.TO's 24.40% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CIF.TO vs. XDIV.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
CIF.TO has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is higher than XDIV.TO's 0.11% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CIF.TO vs. XDIV.TO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Infrastructure Index ETF (CIF.TO) and iShares Core MSCI Canadian Quality Dividend Index ETF (XDIV.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CIF.TO vs. XDIV.TO - Dividend Comparison
CIF.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.84%, less than XDIV.TO's 4.31% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIF.TO iShares Global Infrastructure Index ETF | 2.84% | 2.63% | 2.83% | 2.49% | 2.30% | 2.05% | 2.73% | 2.53% | 2.01% | 2.69% | 6.64% | 4.27% |
XDIV.TO iShares Core MSCI Canadian Quality Dividend Index ETF | 4.31% | 4.42% | 4.15% | 3.76% | 4.82% | 4.22% | 5.10% | 1.91% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
CIF.TO vs. XDIV.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CIF.TO drawdown since its inception was -42.37%, roughly equal to the maximum XDIV.TO drawdown of -41.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIF.TO and XDIV.TO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CIF.TO vs. XDIV.TO - Volatility Comparison
iShares Global Infrastructure Index ETF (CIF.TO) has a higher volatility of 3.82% compared to iShares Core MSCI Canadian Quality Dividend Index ETF (XDIV.TO) at 2.92%. This indicates that CIF.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDIV.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.