PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CIF.TO vs. MLPP.L
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


CIF.TOMLPP.L
YTD Return33.91%18.79%
1Y Return42.89%17.12%
3Y Return (Ann)17.14%27.75%
5Y Return (Ann)14.64%19.51%
10Y Return (Ann)10.68%7.16%
Sharpe Ratio4.111.27
Sortino Ratio5.971.85
Omega Ratio1.791.22
Calmar Ratio9.351.99
Martin Ratio27.055.40
Ulcer Index1.65%3.19%
Daily Std Dev10.81%13.54%
Max Drawdown-42.37%-71.89%
Current Drawdown0.00%0.00%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.4

The correlation between CIF.TO and MLPP.L is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

CIF.TO vs. MLPP.L - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, CIF.TO achieves a 33.91% return, which is significantly higher than MLPP.L's 18.79% return. Over the past 10 years, CIF.TO has outperformed MLPP.L with an annualized return of 10.68%, while MLPP.L has yielded a comparatively lower 7.16% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%5.00%10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
12.43%
5.97%
CIF.TO
MLPP.L

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CIF.TO vs. MLPP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

CIF.TO has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is higher than MLPP.L's 0.50% expense ratio.


CIF.TO
iShares Global Infrastructure Index ETF
Expense ratio chart for CIF.TO: current value at 0.72% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.72%
Expense ratio chart for MLPP.L: current value at 0.50% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.50%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

CIF.TO vs. MLPP.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Infrastructure Index ETF (CIF.TO) and Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (Dist) (MLPP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CIF.TO
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CIF.TO, currently valued at 2.94, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.002.94
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CIF.TO, currently valued at 4.14, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.004.14
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CIF.TO, currently valued at 1.53, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.53
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CIF.TO, currently valued at 7.19, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.007.19
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CIF.TO, currently valued at 18.57, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.0018.57
MLPP.L
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for MLPP.L, currently valued at 1.69, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.001.69
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for MLPP.L, currently valued at 2.37, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.002.37
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for MLPP.L, currently valued at 1.30, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.30
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for MLPP.L, currently valued at 2.62, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.002.62
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for MLPP.L, currently valued at 8.19, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.008.19

CIF.TO vs. MLPP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CIF.TO Sharpe Ratio is 4.11, which is higher than the MLPP.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CIF.TO and MLPP.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.502.002.503.003.50JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2.94
1.69
CIF.TO
MLPP.L

Dividends

CIF.TO vs. MLPP.L - Dividend Comparison

CIF.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.84%, less than MLPP.L's 8.11% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
CIF.TO
iShares Global Infrastructure Index ETF
2.84%2.63%2.83%2.49%2.30%2.05%2.73%2.53%2.01%2.69%6.64%4.27%
MLPP.L
Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (Dist)
8.11%10.96%9.61%11.58%15.08%12.89%12.65%11.00%10.02%15.00%10.28%4.23%

Drawdowns

CIF.TO vs. MLPP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CIF.TO drawdown since its inception was -42.37%, smaller than the maximum MLPP.L drawdown of -71.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIF.TO and MLPP.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember0
-0.18%
CIF.TO
MLPP.L

Volatility

CIF.TO vs. MLPP.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares Global Infrastructure Index ETF (CIF.TO) has a higher volatility of 3.76% compared to Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (Dist) (MLPP.L) at 3.04%. This indicates that CIF.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MLPP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
3.76%
3.04%
CIF.TO
MLPP.L