RIGS vs. IDOG
Compare and contrast key facts about RiverFront Strategic Income Fund (RIGS) and ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (IDOG).
RIGS and IDOG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RIGS is an actively managed fund by SS&C. It was launched on Oct 9, 2013. IDOG is a passively managed fund by SS&C that tracks the performance of the S-Network International Sector Dividend Dogs Index. It was launched on Jun 27, 2013.
Performance
RIGS vs. IDOG - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RIGS vs. IDOG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RIGS RiverFront Strategic Income Fund | 0.28% | 4.63% | 4.45% | 6.07% | -5.72% | 1.93% | 3.58% | 7.60% | -0.11% | 4.48% |
IDOG ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF | 9.20% | 39.94% | 1.35% | 23.57% | -4.50% | 11.33% | -1.78% | 21.93% | -13.47% | 25.61% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RIGS achieves a 0.28% return, which is significantly lower than IDOG's 9.20% return. Over the past 10 years, RIGS has underperformed IDOG with an annualized return of 3.30%, while IDOG has yielded a comparatively higher 10.70% annualized return.
RIGS
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- -0.27%
- YTD
- 0.28%
- 6M
- 2.52%
- 1Y
- 3.77%
- 3Y*
- 4.32%
- 5Y*
- 2.17%
- 10Y*
- 3.30%
IDOG
- 1D
- 0.64%
- 1M
- -0.46%
- YTD
- 9.20%
- 6M
- 18.16%
- 1Y
- 37.24%
- 3Y*
- 20.24%
- 5Y*
- 13.76%
- 10Y*
- 10.70%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RIGS vs. IDOG - Expense Ratio Comparison
RIGS has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is lower than IDOG's 0.50% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RIGS vs. IDOG — Risk / Return Rank
RIGS
IDOG
RIGS vs. IDOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RiverFront Strategic Income Fund (RIGS) and ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (IDOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RIGS | IDOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.37 | 2.28 | -1.90 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.60 | 3.08 | -2.48 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.43 | -0.35 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.74 | 3.40 | -2.66 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.87 | 17.12 | -15.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RIGS | IDOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 | 2.28 | -1.90 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 | 0.89 | -0.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 | 0.61 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.50 | -0.05 |
Correlation
The correlation between RIGS and IDOG is 0.27, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
RIGS vs. IDOG - Dividend Comparison
RIGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.84%, more than IDOG's 3.57% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RIGS RiverFront Strategic Income Fund | 4.84% | 4.84% | 4.49% | 3.48% | 2.71% | 2.47% | 3.77% | 3.87% | 4.54% | 4.45% | 4.46% | 3.61% |
IDOG ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF | 3.57% | 4.26% | 4.90% | 4.86% | 4.46% | 3.85% | 3.00% | 5.41% | 4.50% | 3.33% | 4.01% | 4.19% |
Drawdowns
RIGS vs. IDOG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RIGS drawdown since its inception was -15.31%, smaller than the maximum IDOG drawdown of -37.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RIGS and IDOG.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RIGS | IDOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.31% | -37.32% | +22.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.18% | -10.80% | +5.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -9.03% | -25.31% | +16.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -15.31% | -37.32% | +22.01% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.15% | -1.60% | -0.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.60% | -8.03% | +6.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.05% | 2.22% | -0.17% |
Volatility
RIGS vs. IDOG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for RiverFront Strategic Income Fund (RIGS) is 2.20%, while ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (IDOG) has a volatility of 5.74%. This indicates that RIGS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IDOG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RIGS | IDOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.20% | 5.74% | -3.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.17% | 9.77% | -3.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.15% | 16.44% | -6.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.47% | 15.57% | -8.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.74% | 17.47% | -9.73% |