RIGS vs. HYEM
RIGS (RiverFront Strategic Income Fund) and HYEM (VanEck Vectors Emerging Markets High Yield Bond ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds. RIGS is actively managed, while HYEM is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, RIGS returned 3.15%/yr vs 4.65%/yr for HYEM. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RIGS charges 0.48%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for HYEM.
Performance
RIGS vs. HYEM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RIGS achieves a 0.76% return, which is significantly lower than HYEM's 3.92% return. Over the past 10 years, RIGS has underperformed HYEM with an annualized return of 3.15%, while HYEM has yielded a comparatively higher 4.65% annualized return.
RIGS
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- 0.07%
- YTD
- 0.76%
- 6M
- 0.41%
- 1Y
- 3.91%
- 3Y*
- 4.62%
- 5Y*
- 2.13%
- 10Y*
- 3.15%
HYEM
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 1.26%
- YTD
- 3.92%
- 6M
- 4.87%
- 1Y
- 10.30%
- 3Y*
- 11.00%
- 5Y*
- 3.04%
- 10Y*
- 4.65%
RIGS vs. HYEM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RIGS RiverFront Strategic Income Fund | 0.76% | 4.63% | 4.45% | 6.07% | -5.72% | 1.93% | 3.58% | 7.60% | -0.11% | 4.48% |
HYEM VanEck Vectors Emerging Markets High Yield Bond ETF | 3.92% | 9.24% | 12.14% | 8.35% | -13.39% | -1.31% | 6.87% | 12.85% | -3.38% | 7.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between RIGS and HYEM is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2013 | 0.28 |
The correlation between RIGS and HYEM shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (1 year) to 0.34 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RIGS vs. HYEM — Risk / Return Rank
RIGS
HYEM
RIGS vs. HYEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RiverFront Strategic Income Fund (RIGS) and VanEck Vectors Emerging Markets High Yield Bond ETF (HYEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RIGS | HYEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.42 | 2.39 | -1.97 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.66 | 3.50 | -2.84 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.47 | -0.38 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.86 | 3.79 | -2.93 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.06 | 15.48 | -13.42 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RIGS | HYEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 | 2.39 | -1.97 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 | 0.41 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.41 | 0.50 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.54 | -0.09 |
Drawdowns
RIGS vs. HYEM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RIGS drawdown since its inception was -15.31%, smaller than the maximum HYEM drawdown of -30.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RIGS and HYEM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RIGS | HYEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.31% | -30.96% | +15.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.55% | -2.73% | -1.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.18% | -5.23% | +0.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -9.03% | -26.30% | +17.27% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -15.31% | -30.96% | +15.65% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.68% | -0.10% | -1.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.60% | -4.40% | +2.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.90% | 0.67% | +1.23% |
Volatility
RIGS vs. HYEM - Volatility Comparison
RiverFront Strategic Income Fund (RIGS) and VanEck Vectors Emerging Markets High Yield Bond ETF (HYEM) have volatilities of 1.32% and 1.33%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RIGS | HYEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.32% | 1.33% | -0.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.74% | 3.24% | +1.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.33% | 4.33% | +5.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.50% | 7.49% | +0.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.75% | 9.27% | -1.52% |
RIGS vs. HYEM - Expense Ratio Comparison
RIGS has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than HYEM's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
RIGS vs. HYEM - Dividend Comparison
RIGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.88%, less than HYEM's 6.52% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYEM VanEck Vectors Emerging Markets High Yield Bond ETF | 6.52% | 6.67% | 6.34% | 6.27% | 6.47% | 5.33% | 5.56% | 6.14% | 5.71% | 5.86% | 6.25% | 7.64% |
RIGS RiverFront Strategic Income Fund | 4.88% | 4.84% | 4.49% | 3.48% | 2.71% | 2.47% | 3.77% | 3.87% | 4.54% | 4.45% | 4.46% | 3.61% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RIGS and HYEM have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HYEM has higher volatility (1.33%) compared to RIGS (1.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RIGS dropped -15.31% vs HYEM's -30.96%.
On 10-year performance, HYEM leads with 4.65% vs 3.15% for RIGS. On fees, HYEM is cheaper at 0.40% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, HYEM has performed better with a 4.65% return vs 3.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HYEM is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for RIGS.
HYEM has the higher dividend yield at 6.52%, compared with 4.88% for RIGS.
They also come from different issuers: SS&C and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for RIGS and 0.40% for HYEM.
HYEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RIGS and HYEM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer