HYEM vs. CEMB
Compare and contrast key facts about VanEck Vectors Emerging Markets High Yield Bond ETF (HYEM) and iShares J.P. Morgan EM Corporate Bond ETF (CEMB).
HYEM and CEMB are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. HYEM is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the BofA Merrill Lynch Diversified High Yield US Emerging Markets Corporate Plus Index. It was launched on May 8, 2012. CEMB is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the JP Morgan CEMBI Broad Diversified. It was launched on Apr 17, 2012. Both HYEM and CEMB are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: HYEM or CEMB.
Key characteristics
| HYEM | CEMB | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 12.21% | 6.14% |
| 1Y Return | 18.37% | 12.67% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 1.71% | 0.29% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 2.65% | 1.62% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 3.91% | 3.20% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 3.41 | 3.02 |
| Sortino Ratio | 5.27 | 4.69 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.72 | 1.62 |
| Calmar Ratio | 1.31 | 1.01 |
| Martin Ratio | 39.68 | 20.60 |
| Ulcer Index | 0.47% | 0.61% |
| Daily Std Dev | 5.45% | 4.18% |
| Max Drawdown | -30.97% | -20.84% |
| Current Drawdown | -0.15% | -1.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between HYEM and CEMB is 0.36, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
HYEM vs. CEMB - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, HYEM achieves a 12.21% return, which is significantly higher than CEMB's 6.14% return. Over the past 10 years, HYEM has outperformed CEMB with an annualized return of 3.91%, while CEMB has yielded a comparatively lower 3.20% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HYEM vs. CEMB - Expense Ratio Comparison
HYEM has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than CEMB's 0.50% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
HYEM vs. CEMB - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Emerging Markets High Yield Bond ETF (HYEM) and iShares J.P. Morgan EM Corporate Bond ETF (CEMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
HYEM vs. CEMB - Dividend Comparison
HYEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.11%, more than CEMB's 5.07% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYEM VanEck Vectors Emerging Markets High Yield Bond ETF | 6.11% | 6.28% | 6.47% | 5.34% | 5.56% | 6.15% | 5.71% | 5.87% | 6.25% | 7.64% | 6.77% | 6.14% |
CEMB iShares J.P. Morgan EM Corporate Bond ETF | 5.07% | 4.77% | 4.28% | 3.51% | 3.86% | 4.19% | 4.66% | 4.06% | 4.25% | 4.76% | 4.23% | 3.93% |
Drawdowns
HYEM vs. CEMB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HYEM drawdown since its inception was -30.97%, which is greater than CEMB's maximum drawdown of -20.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYEM and CEMB. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
HYEM vs. CEMB - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Vectors Emerging Markets High Yield Bond ETF (HYEM) has a higher volatility of 1.98% compared to iShares J.P. Morgan EM Corporate Bond ETF (CEMB) at 1.17%. This indicates that HYEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CEMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.