HYEM vs. CEMB
HYEM (VanEck Emerging Markets High Yield Bond ETF) and CEMB (iShares J.P. Morgan EM Corporate Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HYEM is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the ICE BofA Diversified High Yield US Emerging Markets Corporate Plus Index, while CEMB is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the JP Morgan CEMBI Broad Diversified. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, HYEM returned 4.35%/yr vs 3.28%/yr for CEMB. Their 0.36 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. HYEM charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for CEMB.
Performance
HYEM vs. CEMB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HYEM achieves a 4.23% return, which is significantly higher than CEMB's 1.15% return. Over the past 10 years, HYEM has outperformed CEMB with an annualized return of 4.35%, while CEMB has yielded a comparatively lower 3.28% annualized return.
HYEM
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.10%
- 6M
- 2.68%
- YTD
- 4.23%
- 1Y
- 7.39%
- 3Y*
- 10.21%
- 5Y*
- 3.18%
- 10Y*
- 4.35%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.72%
CEMB
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- -0.54%
- 6M
- 0.51%
- YTD
- 1.15%
- 1Y
- 4.33%
- 3Y*
- 6.79%
- 5Y*
- 1.81%
- 10Y*
- 3.28%
- ALL TIME*
- 3.61%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $2.57M | $2.83M | $3.27M | |
| $1.95M | $2.31M | $4.29M |
HYEM vs. CEMB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYEM VanEck Emerging Markets High Yield Bond ETF | 4.23% | 9.24% | 12.14% | 8.35% | -13.39% | -1.31% | 6.87% | 12.85% | -3.38% | 7.94% |
CEMB iShares J.P. Morgan EM Corporate Bond ETF | 1.15% | 8.86% | 5.81% | 8.37% | -12.58% | -0.59% | 6.77% | 13.90% | -2.57% | 7.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between HYEM and CEMB is 0.46, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.46 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.50 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.59 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2012 | 0.37 |
The correlation between HYEM and CEMB shifts across timeframes, from 0.36 (all time) to 0.59 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HYEM vs. CEMB — Risk / Return Rank
HYEM
CEMB
HYEM vs. CEMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Emerging Markets High Yield Bond ETF (HYEM) and iShares J.P. Morgan EM Corporate Bond ETF (CEMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HYEM | CEMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.28 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.85 | 1.62 | +1.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.42 | 6.85 | +4.57 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HYEM vs. CEMB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HYEM drawdown since its inception was -30.96%, which is greater than CEMB's maximum drawdown of -20.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYEM and CEMB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HYEM | CEMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.96% | -20.84% | -10.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.73% | -2.88% | +0.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.23% | -3.53% | -1.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.29% | -20.48% | -5.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.96% | -20.84% | -10.12% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.24% | -0.69% | +0.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.35% | -3.62% | -0.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.68% | 0.68% | 0.00% |
Volatility
HYEM vs. CEMB - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Emerging Markets High Yield Bond ETF (HYEM) has a higher volatility of 0.71% compared to iShares J.P. Morgan EM Corporate Bond ETF (CEMB) at 0.61%. This indicates that HYEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CEMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HYEM | CEMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.71% | 0.61% | +0.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.16% | 2.51% | +0.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.40% | 3.10% | +1.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.50% | 5.63% | +1.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.26% | 6.27% | +2.99% |
HYEM vs. CEMB - Expense Ratio Comparison
HYEM has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than CEMB's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
HYEM vs. CEMB - Dividend Comparison
HYEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.74%, more than CEMB's 5.23% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEMB iShares J.P. Morgan EM Corporate Bond ETF | 4.80% | 5.14% | 5.11% | 4.77% | 4.29% | 3.51% | 3.86% | 4.19% | 4.66% | 4.06% | 4.26% | 4.76% |
HYEM VanEck Emerging Markets High Yield Bond ETF | 6.17% | 6.67% | 6.34% | 6.27% | 6.47% | 5.33% | 5.56% | 6.14% | 5.71% | 5.86% | 6.25% | 7.64% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HYEM and CEMB have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HYEM has higher volatility (0.71%) compared to CEMB (0.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYEM dropped -30.96% vs CEMB's -20.84%.
On 10-year performance, HYEM leads with 4.35% vs 3.28% for CEMB. On fees, HYEM is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, CEMB has been the lower-risk option at 0.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, HYEM has performed better with a 4.35% return vs 3.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HYEM is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for CEMB.
HYEM has the higher dividend yield at 6.17%, compared with 4.80% for CEMB.
HYEM is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while CEMB is Corporate Bonds. HYEM tracks ICE BofA Diversified High Yield US Emerging Markets Corporate Plus Index, while CEMB tracks JP Morgan CEMBI Broad Diversified. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for HYEM and 0.50% for CEMB.
HYEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HYEM and CEMB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer