RIGS vs. FLRT
Compare and contrast key facts about RiverFront Strategic Income Fund (RIGS) and Pacific Global Senior Loan ETF (FLRT).
RIGS and FLRT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RIGS is an actively managed fund by SS&C. It was launched on Oct 9, 2013. FLRT is an actively managed fund by Pacific Life. It was launched on Feb 19, 2015.
Performance
RIGS vs. FLRT - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RIGS vs. FLRT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RIGS RiverFront Strategic Income Fund | 0.28% | 4.63% | 4.45% | 6.07% | -5.72% | 1.93% | 3.58% | 7.60% | -0.11% | 4.48% |
FLRT Pacific Global Senior Loan ETF | -0.20% | 6.24% | 9.18% | 14.59% | -2.72% | 3.18% | 2.78% | 9.44% | -1.14% | 1.72% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RIGS achieves a 0.28% return, which is significantly higher than FLRT's -0.20% return. Over the past 10 years, RIGS has underperformed FLRT with an annualized return of 3.30%, while FLRT has yielded a comparatively higher 4.94% annualized return.
RIGS
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- -0.27%
- YTD
- 0.28%
- 6M
- 2.52%
- 1Y
- 3.77%
- 3Y*
- 4.32%
- 5Y*
- 2.17%
- 10Y*
- 3.30%
FLRT
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.58%
- YTD
- -0.20%
- 6M
- 1.29%
- 1Y
- 5.44%
- 3Y*
- 8.83%
- 5Y*
- 5.70%
- 10Y*
- 4.94%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RIGS vs. FLRT - Expense Ratio Comparison
RIGS has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is lower than FLRT's 0.69% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RIGS vs. FLRT — Risk / Return Rank
RIGS
FLRT
RIGS vs. FLRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RiverFront Strategic Income Fund (RIGS) and Pacific Global Senior Loan ETF (FLRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RIGS | FLRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.37 | 1.80 | -1.43 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.60 | 2.31 | -1.70 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.56 | -0.48 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.74 | 2.15 | -1.42 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.87 | 8.63 | -6.76 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RIGS | FLRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 | 1.80 | -1.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 | 2.47 | -2.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 | 0.79 | -0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.73 | -0.27 |
Correlation
The correlation between RIGS and FLRT is 0.11, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
RIGS vs. FLRT - Dividend Comparison
RIGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.84%, less than FLRT's 6.92% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RIGS RiverFront Strategic Income Fund | 4.84% | 4.84% | 4.49% | 3.48% | 2.71% | 2.47% | 3.77% | 3.87% | 4.54% | 4.45% | 4.46% | 3.61% |
FLRT Pacific Global Senior Loan ETF | 6.92% | 6.93% | 7.93% | 8.40% | 5.81% | 3.16% | 3.52% | 4.30% | 3.95% | 3.20% | 3.38% | 3.21% |
Drawdowns
RIGS vs. FLRT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RIGS drawdown since its inception was -15.31%, smaller than the maximum FLRT drawdown of -20.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RIGS and FLRT.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RIGS | FLRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.31% | -20.96% | +5.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.18% | -2.47% | -2.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -9.03% | -7.60% | -1.43% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -15.31% | -20.96% | +5.65% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.15% | -0.88% | -1.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.60% | -1.43% | -0.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.05% | 0.62% | +1.43% |
Volatility
RIGS vs. FLRT - Volatility Comparison
RiverFront Strategic Income Fund (RIGS) has a higher volatility of 2.20% compared to Pacific Global Senior Loan ETF (FLRT) at 0.46%. This indicates that RIGS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RIGS | FLRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.20% | 0.46% | +1.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.17% | 1.22% | +4.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.15% | 3.04% | +7.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.47% | 2.32% | +5.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.74% | 6.24% | +1.50% |