RIGS vs. EQL
Compare and contrast key facts about RiverFront Strategic Income Fund (RIGS) and Alps Equal Sector Weight ETF (EQL).
RIGS and EQL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RIGS is an actively managed fund by SS&C. It was launched on Oct 9, 2013. EQL is a passively managed fund by SS&C that tracks the performance of the NYSE Select Sector Equal Weight Index. It was launched on Jul 7, 2009.
Performance
RIGS vs. EQL - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RIGS vs. EQL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RIGS RiverFront Strategic Income Fund | 0.28% | 4.63% | 4.45% | 6.07% | -5.72% | 1.93% | 3.58% | 7.60% | -0.11% | 4.48% |
EQL Alps Equal Sector Weight ETF | 3.18% | 13.09% | 16.44% | 16.87% | -10.72% | 29.32% | 10.87% | 27.87% | -6.12% | 18.37% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RIGS achieves a 0.28% return, which is significantly lower than EQL's 3.18% return. Over the past 10 years, RIGS has underperformed EQL with an annualized return of 3.30%, while EQL has yielded a comparatively higher 12.17% annualized return.
RIGS
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- -0.27%
- YTD
- 0.28%
- 6M
- 2.52%
- 1Y
- 3.77%
- 3Y*
- 4.32%
- 5Y*
- 2.17%
- 10Y*
- 3.30%
EQL
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- -4.16%
- YTD
- 3.18%
- 6M
- 4.20%
- 1Y
- 15.32%
- 3Y*
- 14.94%
- 5Y*
- 10.72%
- 10Y*
- 12.17%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RIGS vs. EQL - Expense Ratio Comparison
RIGS has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than EQL's 0.28% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RIGS vs. EQL — Risk / Return Rank
RIGS
EQL
RIGS vs. EQL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RiverFront Strategic Income Fund (RIGS) and Alps Equal Sector Weight ETF (EQL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RIGS | EQL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.37 | 1.03 | -0.66 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.60 | 1.50 | -0.89 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.23 | -0.15 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.74 | 1.31 | -0.57 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.87 | 6.43 | -4.56 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RIGS | EQL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 | 1.03 | -0.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 | 0.74 | -0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 | 0.74 | -0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.84 | -0.38 |
Correlation
The correlation between RIGS and EQL is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
RIGS vs. EQL - Dividend Comparison
RIGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.84%, more than EQL's 1.71% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RIGS RiverFront Strategic Income Fund | 4.84% | 4.84% | 4.49% | 3.48% | 2.71% | 2.47% | 3.77% | 3.87% | 4.54% | 4.45% | 4.46% | 3.61% |
EQL Alps Equal Sector Weight ETF | 1.71% | 1.73% | 1.78% | 1.96% | 2.14% | 1.69% | 2.29% | 1.95% | 2.39% | 1.97% | 2.89% | 2.07% |
Drawdowns
RIGS vs. EQL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RIGS drawdown since its inception was -15.31%, smaller than the maximum EQL drawdown of -35.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RIGS and EQL.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RIGS | EQL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.31% | -35.65% | +20.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.18% | -11.90% | +6.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -9.03% | -19.24% | +10.21% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -15.31% | -35.65% | +20.34% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.15% | -4.27% | +2.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.60% | -3.28% | +1.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.05% | 2.42% | -0.37% |
Volatility
RIGS vs. EQL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for RiverFront Strategic Income Fund (RIGS) is 2.20%, while Alps Equal Sector Weight ETF (EQL) has a volatility of 3.88%. This indicates that RIGS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EQL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RIGS | EQL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.20% | 3.88% | -1.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.17% | 7.31% | -1.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.15% | 14.87% | -4.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.47% | 14.59% | -7.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.74% | 16.55% | -8.81% |