RIGS vs. EINC
RIGS (RiverFront Strategic Income Fund) and EINC (VanEck Energy Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RIGS is a High Yield Bonds fund actively managed by SS&C, while EINC is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MVIS North America Energy Infrastructure Index. RIGS is actively managed, while EINC is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, RIGS returned 2.78%/yr vs 11.77%/yr for EINC. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RIGS charges 0.48%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for EINC.
Performance
RIGS vs. EINC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RIGS achieves a -0.47% return, which is significantly lower than EINC's 28.74% return. Over the past 10 years, RIGS has underperformed EINC with an annualized return of 2.78%, while EINC has yielded a comparatively higher 11.77% annualized return.
RIGS
- 1D
- -1.67%
- 1M
- -1.52%
- 6M
- -0.90%
- YTD
- -0.47%
- 1Y
- 2.77%
- 3Y*
- 4.17%
- 5Y*
- 1.74%
- 10Y*
- 2.78%
EINC
- 1D
- 1.55%
- 1M
- 1.87%
- 6M
- 30.32%
- YTD
- 28.74%
- 1Y
- 32.69%
- 3Y*
- 28.67%
- 5Y*
- 22.43%
- 10Y*
- 11.77%
RIGS vs. EINC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RIGS RiverFront Strategic Income Fund | -0.47% | 4.63% | 4.45% | 6.07% | -5.72% | 1.93% | 3.58% | 7.60% | -0.11% | 4.48% |
EINC VanEck Energy Income ETF | 28.74% | 7.11% | 42.79% | 15.55% | 19.18% | 38.05% | -19.89% | 16.98% | -19.85% | -3.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between RIGS and EINC is -0.17, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2013 | 0.21 |
The correlation between RIGS and EINC shifts across timeframes, from -0.17 (1 year) to 0.21 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RIGS vs. EINC — Risk / Return Rank
RIGS
EINC
RIGS vs. EINC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RiverFront Strategic Income Fund (RIGS) and VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RIGS | EINC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.87 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.37 | -0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.61 | 4.16 | -3.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.40 | 10.24 | -8.84 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RIGS vs. EINC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RIGS drawdown since its inception was -15.31%, smaller than the maximum EINC drawdown of -87.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RIGS and EINC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RIGS | EINC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.31% | -87.55% | +72.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.55% | -7.89% | +3.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.18% | -16.01% | +10.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -9.03% | -19.87% | +10.84% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -15.31% | -68.85% | +53.54% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.89% | -2.40% | -0.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.60% | -44.01% | +42.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.98% | 3.20% | -1.22% |
Volatility
RIGS vs. EINC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for RiverFront Strategic Income Fund (RIGS) is 3.83%, while VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC) has a volatility of 6.06%. This indicates that RIGS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EINC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RIGS | EINC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.83% | 6.06% | -2.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.65% | 12.30% | -5.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.41% | 15.42% | -5.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.83% | 19.58% | -11.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.88% | 25.34% | -17.46% |
RIGS vs. EINC - Expense Ratio Comparison
RIGS has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than EINC's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
RIGS vs. EINC - Dividend Comparison
RIGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.92%, more than EINC's 3.44% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EINC VanEck Energy Income ETF | 3.44% | 4.51% | 3.33% | 3.77% | 2.89% | 6.03% | 6.69% | 9.66% | 11.31% | 8.53% | 9.71% | 28.53% |
RIGS RiverFront Strategic Income Fund | 4.92% | 4.84% | 4.49% | 3.48% | 2.71% | 2.47% | 3.77% | 3.87% | 4.54% | 4.45% | 4.46% | 3.61% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RIGS and EINC have a correlation of -0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EINC has higher volatility (6.06%) compared to RIGS (3.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RIGS dropped -15.31% vs EINC's -87.55%.
On 10-year performance, EINC leads with 11.77% vs 2.78% for RIGS. On fees, EINC is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, RIGS has been the lower-risk option at 3.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, EINC has performed better with a 11.77% return vs 2.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EINC is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for RIGS.
RIGS has the higher dividend yield at 4.92%, compared with 3.44% for EINC.
RIGS is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while EINC is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: SS&C and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for RIGS and 0.45% for EINC.
EINC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RIGS and EINC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer