RIGS vs. AMLP
Compare and contrast key facts about RiverFront Strategic Income Fund (RIGS) and Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP).
RIGS and AMLP are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RIGS is an actively managed fund by SS&C. It was launched on Oct 9, 2013. AMLP is a passively managed fund by SS&C that tracks the performance of the Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index. It was launched on Aug 23, 2010.
Performance
RIGS vs. AMLP - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RIGS vs. AMLP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RIGS RiverFront Strategic Income Fund | 0.28% | 4.63% | 4.45% | 6.07% | -5.72% | 1.93% | 3.58% | 7.60% | -0.11% | 4.48% |
AMLP Alerian MLP ETF | 13.01% | 5.78% | 22.76% | 21.40% | 25.47% | 39.09% | -32.26% | 5.99% | -12.67% | -7.89% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RIGS achieves a 0.28% return, which is significantly lower than AMLP's 13.01% return. Over the past 10 years, RIGS has underperformed AMLP with an annualized return of 3.30%, while AMLP has yielded a comparatively higher 8.52% annualized return.
RIGS
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- -0.27%
- YTD
- 0.28%
- 6M
- 2.52%
- 1Y
- 3.77%
- 3Y*
- 4.32%
- 5Y*
- 2.17%
- 10Y*
- 3.30%
AMLP
- 1D
- -1.04%
- 1M
- -1.12%
- YTD
- 13.01%
- 6M
- 15.79%
- 1Y
- 8.11%
- 3Y*
- 19.85%
- 5Y*
- 20.13%
- 10Y*
- 8.52%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RIGS vs. AMLP - Expense Ratio Comparison
RIGS has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is lower than AMLP's 0.90% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RIGS vs. AMLP — Risk / Return Rank
RIGS
AMLP
RIGS vs. AMLP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RiverFront Strategic Income Fund (RIGS) and Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RIGS | AMLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.37 | 0.51 | -0.13 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.60 | 0.75 | -0.15 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.11 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.74 | 0.62 | +0.12 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.87 | 1.57 | +0.30 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RIGS | AMLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 | 0.51 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 | 1.00 | -0.71 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 | 0.31 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.22 | +0.23 |
Correlation
The correlation between RIGS and AMLP is 0.20, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
RIGS vs. AMLP - Dividend Comparison
RIGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.84%, less than AMLP's 7.62% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RIGS RiverFront Strategic Income Fund | 4.84% | 4.84% | 4.49% | 3.48% | 2.71% | 2.47% | 3.77% | 3.87% | 4.54% | 4.45% | 4.46% | 3.61% |
AMLP Alerian MLP ETF | 7.62% | 8.36% | 7.70% | 7.86% | 7.70% | 8.55% | 12.31% | 9.12% | 9.29% | 7.97% | 8.09% | 9.84% |
Drawdowns
RIGS vs. AMLP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RIGS drawdown since its inception was -15.31%, smaller than the maximum AMLP drawdown of -77.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RIGS and AMLP.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RIGS | AMLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.31% | -77.19% | +61.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.18% | -14.27% | +9.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -9.03% | -20.92% | +11.89% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -15.31% | -72.62% | +57.31% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.15% | -3.20% | +1.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.60% | -17.57% | +15.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.05% | 5.61% | -3.56% |
Volatility
RIGS vs. AMLP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for RiverFront Strategic Income Fund (RIGS) is 2.20%, while Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP) has a volatility of 3.09%. This indicates that RIGS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMLP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RIGS | AMLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.20% | 3.09% | -0.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.17% | 7.94% | -1.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.15% | 16.12% | -5.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.47% | 20.17% | -12.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.74% | 27.84% | -20.10% |