RIFR vs. POW

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

RIFR (Russell Investments Global Infrastructure ETF) and POW (VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RIFR is a Industrials Equities fund actively managed by Russell, while POW is a Actively Managed fund actively managed by VistaShares. Both are actively managed. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RIFR charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for POW.

Performance

RIFR vs. POW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Russell Investments Global Infrastructure ETF (RIFR) and VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RIFR achieves a 12.47% return, which is significantly lower than POW's 38.93% return.

RIFR

• 1D: 0.23%
• 1M: 1.05%
• 6M: 12.74%
• YTD: 12.47%
• 1Y: 16.94%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

POW

• 1D: -3.60%
• 1M: -8.76%
• 6M: 31.71%
• YTD: 38.93%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RIFR vs. POW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
RIFR Russell Investments Global Infrastructure ETF	12.47%	-1.01%
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF	38.93%	-1.70%

Correlation

The correlation between RIFR and POW is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025	0.21

Return for Risk

RIFR vs. POW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RIFR

RIFR Risk / Return Rank: 58
RIFR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
RIFR Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
RIFR Omega Ratio Rank: 56
RIFR Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
RIFR Martin Ratio Rank: 55

POW

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RIFR vs. POW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Russell Investments Global Infrastructure ETF (RIFR) and VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RIFR	POW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.57	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.19	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.50	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.60	—	—

Drawdowns

RIFR vs. POW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RIFR drawdown since its inception was -6.80%, smaller than the maximum POW drawdown of -18.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RIFR and POW.

Drawdown Indicators

	RIFR	POW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-6.80%	-18.37%	+11.57%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.80%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.79%	-18.37%	+17.58%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.66%	-4.33%	+2.67%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.23%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	RIFR	POW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.54%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.97%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.86%	32.94%	-22.08%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.79%	32.94%	-22.15%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.79%	32.94%	-22.15%

RIFR vs. POW - Expense Ratio Comparison

RIFR has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than POW's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

RIFR vs. POW - Dividend Comparison

RIFR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%, more than POW's 0.14% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF	0.14%	0.19%
RIFR Russell Investments Global Infrastructure ETF	0.87%	0.98%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RIFR and POW in my portfolio?

RIFR and POW have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, RIFR or POW?

On fees, RIFR is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, RIFR or POW?

RIFR is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for POW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RIFR or POW?

RIFR has the higher dividend yield at 0.87%, compared with 0.14% for POW.

What is the main difference between RIFR and POW?

RIFR is categorized as Industrials Equities, while POW is Actively Managed. They also come from different issuers: Russell and VistaShares. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for RIFR and 0.75% for POW.