RIFR vs. NFRA
RIFR (Russell Investments Global Infrastructure ETF) and NFRA (FlexShares STOXX Global Broad Infrastructure Index Fund) are both Infrastructure Equities funds. RIFR is actively managed, while NFRA is passively managed. Over the past year, RIFR returned 14.73% vs 13.70% for NFRA. Their 0.78 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. RIFR charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for NFRA.
Performance
RIFR vs. NFRA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RIFR achieves a 11.99% return, which is significantly higher than NFRA's 8.91% return.
RIFR
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- 0.17%
- 6M
- 7.94%
- YTD
- 11.99%
- 1Y
- 14.73%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 16.30%
NFRA
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- 1.08%
- 6M
- 5.98%
- YTD
- 8.91%
- 1Y
- 13.70%
- 3Y*
- 11.88%
- 5Y*
- 5.93%
- 10Y*
- 6.83%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.90%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $3.34M | $2.60M | $4.28M | |
| $131.11K | $117.29K | $147.83K |
RIFR vs. NFRA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
RIFR Russell Investments Global Infrastructure ETF | 11.99% | 7.25% |
NFRA FlexShares STOXX Global Broad Infrastructure Index Fund | 8.91% | 8.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between RIFR and NFRA is 0.75, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2025 | 0.78 |
The correlation between RIFR and NFRA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RIFR vs. NFRA — Risk / Return Rank
RIFR
NFRA
RIFR vs. NFRA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Russell Investments Global Infrastructure ETF (RIFR) and FlexShares STOXX Global Broad Infrastructure Index Fund (NFRA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RIFR | NFRA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.25 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.28 | 1.94 | +0.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.92 | 5.78 | +1.13 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RIFR vs. NFRA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RIFR drawdown since its inception was -6.80%, smaller than the maximum NFRA drawdown of -32.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RIFR and NFRA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RIFR | NFRA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.80% | -32.49% | +25.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.80% | -7.28% | +0.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -9.16% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.75% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -32.49% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.21% | -2.16% | +0.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.62% | -4.50% | +2.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.24% | 2.44% | -0.20% |
Volatility
RIFR vs. NFRA - Volatility Comparison
Russell Investments Global Infrastructure ETF (RIFR) has a higher volatility of 3.04% compared to FlexShares STOXX Global Broad Infrastructure Index Fund (NFRA) at 2.42%. This indicates that RIFR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NFRA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RIFR | NFRA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.04% | 2.42% | +0.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.91% | 8.44% | +0.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.81% | 10.38% | +0.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.69% | 12.95% | -2.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.69% | 14.87% | -4.18% |
RIFR vs. NFRA - Expense Ratio Comparison
RIFR has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than NFRA's 0.47% expense ratio.
Dividends
RIFR vs. NFRA - Dividend Comparison
RIFR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%, less than NFRA's 5.68% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NFRA FlexShares STOXX Global Broad Infrastructure Index Fund | 5.68% | 6.00% | 3.33% | 2.57% | 2.28% | 2.71% | 2.22% | 2.27% | 3.06% | 2.81% | 2.98% | 2.47% |
RIFR Russell Investments Global Infrastructure ETF | 0.87% | 0.98% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RIFR and NFRA have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RIFR has higher volatility (3.04%) compared to NFRA (2.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RIFR dropped -6.80% vs NFRA's -32.49%.
On 1-year performance, RIFR leads with 14.73% vs 13.70% for NFRA. On fees, NFRA is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, NFRA has been the lower-risk option at 2.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, RIFR has performed better with a 14.73% return vs 13.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NFRA is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for RIFR.
NFRA has the higher dividend yield at 5.68%, compared with 0.87% for RIFR.
They also come from different issuers: Russell and FlexShares. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for RIFR and 0.47% for NFRA.
RIFR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RIFR and NFRA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer