RICK vs. HL
RICK (RCI Hospitality Holdings, Inc.) and HL (Hecla Mining Company) are both stocks. RICK operates in Restaurants (Consumer Cyclical), while HL operates in Gold (Basic Materials). Over the past 10 years, RICK returned 11.05%/yr vs 13.95%/yr for HL. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
RICK vs. HL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RICK achieves a 15.11% return, which is significantly higher than HL's -20.29% return. Over the past 10 years, RICK has underperformed HL with an annualized return of 11.05%, while HL has yielded a comparatively higher 13.95% annualized return.
RICK
- 1D
- 1.60%
- 1M
- 13.59%
- YTD
- 15.11%
- 6M
- 1.90%
- 1Y
- -30.50%
- 3Y*
- -28.96%
- 5Y*
- -16.63%
- 10Y*
- 11.05%
HL
- 1D
- 2.00%
- 1M
- -13.30%
- YTD
- -20.29%
- 6M
- -18.68%
- 1Y
- 154.71%
- 3Y*
- 42.93%
- 5Y*
- 11.61%
- 10Y*
- 13.95%
RICK vs. HL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RICK RCI Hospitality Holdings, Inc. | 15.11% | -58.19% | -12.81% | -28.66% | 20.04% | 97.94% | 93.85% | -7.54% | -19.86% | 64.51% |
HL Hecla Mining Company | -20.29% | 291.70% | 2.82% | -12.93% | 6.99% | -18.97% | 91.83% | 44.43% | -40.37% | -24.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between RICK and HL is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 1995 | 0.10 |
The correlation between RICK and HL shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (1 year) to 0.21 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
RICK:
$211.65M
HL:
$10.32B
RICK:
-$0.77
HL:
$0.84
RICK:
0.82
HL:
6.47
RICK:
0.92
HL:
4.02
RICK:
$281.63M
HL:
$1.57B
RICK:
$176.59M
HL:
$788.95M
RICK:
$30.38M
HL:
$864.40M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RICK vs. HL — Risk / Return Rank
RICK
HL
RICK vs. HL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RCI Hospitality Holdings, Inc. (RICK) and Hecla Mining Company (HL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RICK | HL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.85 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | 1.32 | -0.42 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.70 | 2.80 | -3.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.00 | 6.33 | -7.33 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RICK vs. HL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RICK drawdown since its inception was -94.54%, roughly equal to the maximum HL drawdown of -97.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RICK and HL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RICK | HL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.54% | -97.92% | +3.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -48.83% | -55.81% | +6.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -72.58% | -55.81% | -16.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -78.09% | -61.04% | -17.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -78.72% | -82.45% | +3.73% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -71.23% | -51.91% | -19.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -53.94% | -69.93% | +15.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 35.20% | 24.67% | +10.53% |
Volatility
RICK vs. HL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for RCI Hospitality Holdings, Inc. (RICK) is 10.13%, while Hecla Mining Company (HL) has a volatility of 22.72%. This indicates that RICK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RICK | HL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.13% | 22.72% | -12.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.93% | 54.93% | -24.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 49.45% | 72.59% | -23.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.10% | 59.35% | -16.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 52.00% | 62.77% | -10.77% |
Dividends
RICK vs. HL - Dividend Comparison
RICK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.06%, more than HL's 0.10% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HL Hecla Mining Company | 0.10% | 0.08% | 0.81% | 0.65% | 0.40% | 0.72% | 0.25% | 0.29% | 0.42% | 0.25% | 0.19% | 0.53% |
RICK RCI Hospitality Holdings, Inc. | 1.06% | 1.17% | 0.45% | 0.36% | 0.21% | 0.21% | 0.38% | 0.63% | 0.54% | 0.43% | 0.70% | 0.00% |
Financials
RICK vs. HL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between RCI Hospitality Holdings, Inc. and Hecla Mining Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
RICK vs. HL - Profitability Comparison
RICK - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, RCI Hospitality Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 59.92M and revenue of 68.72M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 87.2%.
HL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hecla Mining Company reported a gross profit of 253.26M and revenue of 411.43M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 61.6%.
RICK - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, RCI Hospitality Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 3.81M and revenue of 68.72M, resulting in an operating margin of 5.6%.
HL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hecla Mining Company reported an operating income of 223.11M and revenue of 411.43M, resulting in an operating margin of 54.2%.
RICK - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, RCI Hospitality Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of -326.00K and revenue of 68.72M, resulting in a net margin of -0.5%.
HL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hecla Mining Company reported a net income of 266.45M and revenue of 411.43M, resulting in a net margin of 64.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
RICK and HL have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HL has higher volatility (22.72%) compared to RICK (10.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RICK dropped -94.54% vs HL's -97.92%.
HL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs -0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RICK and HL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer