RIBIX vs. QDIBX
Compare and contrast key facts about RBC Impact Bond Fund (RIBIX) and Fisher Investments Institutional Group Fixed Income Fund for Retirement Plans (QDIBX).
RIBIX is managed by RBC Global Asset Management.. It was launched on Dec 18, 2017. QDIBX is managed by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Dec 13, 2019.
Performance
RIBIX vs. QDIBX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RIBIX vs. QDIBX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RIBIX RBC Impact Bond Fund | -0.92% | 5.95% | 1.11% | 5.50% | -14.47% | -1.86% | 7.98% | -0.06% |
QDIBX Fisher Investments Institutional Group Fixed Income Fund for Retirement Plans | 0.00% | 7.72% | 1.66% | 6.71% | -14.11% | -0.17% | 6.77% | -0.10% |
Returns By Period
RIBIX
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- -1.62%
- YTD
- -0.92%
- 6M
- -0.38%
- 1Y
- 1.63%
- 3Y*
- 2.74%
- 5Y*
- -0.68%
- 10Y*
- —
QDIBX
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- -1.22%
- YTD
- 0.00%
- 6M
- 0.90%
- 1Y
- 4.08%
- 3Y*
- 4.27%
- 5Y*
- 0.37%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RIBIX vs. QDIBX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RIBIX has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is higher than QDIBX's 0.03% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RIBIX vs. QDIBX — Risk / Return Rank
RIBIX
QDIBX
RIBIX vs. QDIBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RBC Impact Bond Fund (RIBIX) and Fisher Investments Institutional Group Fixed Income Fund for Retirement Plans (QDIBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RIBIX | QDIBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.42 | 1.06 | -0.63 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.61 | 1.55 | -0.94 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.19 | -0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.10 | 1.81 | -0.71 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.72 | 5.30 | -2.58 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RIBIX | QDIBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 | 1.06 | -0.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.12 | 0.06 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.19 | 0.17 | +0.02 |
Correlation
The correlation between RIBIX and QDIBX is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
RIBIX vs. QDIBX - Dividend Comparison
RIBIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.77%, more than QDIBX's 3.50% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RIBIX RBC Impact Bond Fund | 3.77% | 4.02% | 3.35% | 2.50% | 2.10% | 1.94% | 3.28% | 3.91% | 2.44% | 0.05% |
QDIBX Fisher Investments Institutional Group Fixed Income Fund for Retirement Plans | 3.50% | 3.50% | 3.55% | 3.65% | 2.51% | 1.80% | 3.25% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
RIBIX vs. QDIBX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RIBIX drawdown since its inception was -19.37%, roughly equal to the maximum QDIBX drawdown of -19.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RIBIX and QDIBX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RIBIX | QDIBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.37% | -19.63% | +0.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.88% | -2.58% | -0.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.98% | -19.63% | +0.65% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.29% | -1.76% | -4.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.43% | -6.52% | +0.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.17% | 0.88% | +0.29% |
Volatility
RIBIX vs. QDIBX - Volatility Comparison
RBC Impact Bond Fund (RIBIX) has a higher volatility of 1.67% compared to Fisher Investments Institutional Group Fixed Income Fund for Retirement Plans (QDIBX) at 1.46%. This indicates that RIBIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QDIBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RIBIX | QDIBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.67% | 1.46% | +0.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.74% | 2.54% | +0.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.76% | 4.32% | +0.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.94% | 6.58% | -0.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.20% | 6.32% | -1.12% |