QDIBX vs. NCRLX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fisher Investments Institutional Group Fixed Income Fund for Retirement Plans (QDIBX) and Neuberger Berman Core Bond Fund (NCRLX).
QDIBX is managed by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Dec 13, 2019. NCRLX is managed by Neuberger Berman. It was launched on Sep 29, 1995.
Performance
QDIBX vs. NCRLX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
QDIBX vs. NCRLX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QDIBX Fisher Investments Institutional Group Fixed Income Fund for Retirement Plans | 0.00% | 7.72% | 1.66% | 6.71% | -14.11% | -0.17% | 6.77% | -0.10% |
NCRLX Neuberger Berman Core Bond Fund | -0.38% | 7.24% | 1.90% | 5.69% | -14.36% | -1.07% | 9.50% | -0.01% |
Returns By Period
QDIBX
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- -1.22%
- YTD
- 0.00%
- 6M
- 0.90%
- 1Y
- 4.08%
- 3Y*
- 4.27%
- 5Y*
- 0.37%
- 10Y*
- —
NCRLX
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- -1.78%
- YTD
- -0.38%
- 6M
- 0.18%
- 1Y
- 3.82%
- 3Y*
- 3.62%
- 5Y*
- -0.04%
- 10Y*
- 1.87%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
QDIBX vs. NCRLX - Expense Ratio Comparison
QDIBX has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than NCRLX's 0.39% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
QDIBX vs. NCRLX — Risk / Return Rank
QDIBX
NCRLX
QDIBX vs. NCRLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fisher Investments Institutional Group Fixed Income Fund for Retirement Plans (QDIBX) and Neuberger Berman Core Bond Fund (NCRLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QDIBX | NCRLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.06 | 0.93 | +0.12 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.55 | 1.35 | +0.19 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.16 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.81 | 1.79 | +0.02 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.30 | 5.39 | -0.10 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QDIBX | NCRLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.06 | 0.93 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.06 | -0.01 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.38 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.17 | 0.49 | -0.32 |
Correlation
The correlation between QDIBX and NCRLX is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
QDIBX vs. NCRLX - Dividend Comparison
QDIBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.50%, less than NCRLX's 4.35% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QDIBX Fisher Investments Institutional Group Fixed Income Fund for Retirement Plans | 3.50% | 3.50% | 3.55% | 3.65% | 2.51% | 1.80% | 3.25% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NCRLX Neuberger Berman Core Bond Fund | 4.35% | 4.68% | 4.76% | 3.90% | 2.63% | 2.47% | 4.76% | 3.37% | 3.00% | 2.80% | 3.37% | 3.15% |
Drawdowns
QDIBX vs. NCRLX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QDIBX drawdown since its inception was -19.63%, roughly equal to the maximum NCRLX drawdown of -19.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDIBX and NCRLX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| QDIBX | NCRLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.63% | -19.21% | -0.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.58% | -2.88% | +0.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.63% | -19.21% | -0.42% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -19.21% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.76% | -2.69% | +0.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.52% | -3.82% | -2.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.88% | 0.96% | -0.08% |
Volatility
QDIBX vs. NCRLX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fisher Investments Institutional Group Fixed Income Fund for Retirement Plans (QDIBX) is 1.46%, while Neuberger Berman Core Bond Fund (NCRLX) has a volatility of 1.58%. This indicates that QDIBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NCRLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| QDIBX | NCRLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.46% | 1.58% | -0.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.54% | 2.65% | -0.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.32% | 4.42% | -0.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.58% | 5.99% | +0.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.32% | 4.98% | +1.34% |