RHTX vs. ALLW

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about RH Tactical Outlook ETF (RHTX) and SPDR Bridgewater All Weather ETF (ALLW).

RHTX and ALLW are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RHTX is an actively managed fund by Adaptive. It was launched on Sep 20, 2012. ALLW is an actively managed fund by State Street. It was launched on Mar 5, 2025.

Performance

RHTX vs. ALLW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RH Tactical Outlook ETF (RHTX) and SPDR Bridgewater All Weather ETF (ALLW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

RHTX vs. ALLW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
RHTX RH Tactical Outlook ETF	-1.00%	18.55%
ALLW SPDR Bridgewater All Weather ETF	4.95%	15.04%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RHTX achieves a -1.00% return, which is significantly lower than ALLW's 4.95% return.

RHTX

• 1D: 3.06%
• 1M: -7.14%
• YTD: -1.00%
• 6M: 2.69%
• 1Y: 19.11%
• 3Y*: 12.59%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ALLW

• 1D: 1.98%
• 1M: -4.28%
• YTD: 4.95%
• 6M: 8.24%
• 1Y: 19.94%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RHTX vs. ALLW - Expense Ratio Comparison

RHTX has a 1.38% expense ratio, which is higher than ALLW's 0.85% expense ratio.

RHTX

RH Tactical Outlook ETF

ALLW

SPDR Bridgewater All Weather ETF

Return for Risk

RHTX vs. ALLW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RHTX

RHTX Risk / Return Rank: 56
RHTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
RHTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
RHTX Omega Ratio Rank: 57
RHTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
RHTX Martin Ratio Rank: 54

ALLW

ALLW Risk / Return Rank: 84
ALLW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
ALLW Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
ALLW Omega Ratio Rank: 83
ALLW Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
ALLW Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RHTX vs. ALLW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RH Tactical Outlook ETF (RHTX) and SPDR Bridgewater All Weather ETF (ALLW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RHTX	ALLW	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.01	1.53	-0.52
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.46	2.06	-0.60
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.31	-0.10
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.53	2.34	-0.81
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.46	10.17	-4.71
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RHTX vs. ALLW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RHTX Sharpe Ratio is 1.01, which is lower than the ALLW Sharpe Ratio of 1.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RHTX and ALLW, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RHTX	ALLW	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.01	1.53	-0.52
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.19	1.51	-1.32

Correlation

The correlation between RHTX and ALLW is 0.64, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

RHTX vs. ALLW - Dividend Comparison

RHTX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ALLW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.45%.

	TTM	2025
RHTX RH Tactical Outlook ETF	0.00%	0.00%
ALLW SPDR Bridgewater All Weather ETF	4.45%	4.67%

Drawdowns

RHTX vs. ALLW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RHTX drawdown since its inception was -24.68%, which is greater than ALLW's maximum drawdown of -8.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RHTX and ALLW.

Drawdown Indicators

	RHTX	ALLW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.68%	-8.78%	-15.90%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.77%	-8.78%	-3.99%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.10%	-4.28%	-5.82%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.87%	-1.18%	-8.69%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.58%	2.02%	+1.56%

Volatility

RHTX vs. ALLW - Volatility Comparison

RH Tactical Outlook ETF (RHTX) has a higher volatility of 6.21% compared to SPDR Bridgewater All Weather ETF (ALLW) at 5.41%. This indicates that RHTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ALLW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RHTX	ALLW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.21%	5.41%	+0.80%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.82%	8.56%	+4.26%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.04%	13.08%	+5.96%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.18%	12.83%	+5.35%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.18%	12.83%	+5.35%