ALLW vs. GLDM

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR Bridgewater All Weather ETF (ALLW) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM).

ALLW and GLDM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ALLW is an actively managed fund by State Street. It was launched on Mar 5, 2025. GLDM is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the LBMA Gold PM Price. It was launched on Jun 25, 2018.

Performance

ALLW vs. GLDM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Bridgewater All Weather ETF (ALLW) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ALLW vs. GLDM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ALLW SPDR Bridgewater All Weather ETF	4.95%	15.04%
GLDM SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust	8.57%	48.16%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ALLW achieves a 4.95% return, which is significantly lower than GLDM's 8.57% return.

ALLW

• 1D: 1.98%
• 1M: -4.28%
• YTD: 4.95%
• 6M: 8.24%
• 1Y: 19.94%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GLDM

• 1D: 3.77%
• 1M: -10.99%
• YTD: 8.57%
• 6M: 21.24%
• 1Y: 49.77%
• 3Y*: 33.33%
• 5Y*: 21.91%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ALLW vs. GLDM - Expense Ratio Comparison

ALLW has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than GLDM's 0.10% expense ratio.

ALLW

SPDR Bridgewater All Weather ETF

GLDM

SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust

Return for Risk

ALLW vs. GLDM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ALLW

ALLW Risk / Return Rank: 84
ALLW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
ALLW Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
ALLW Omega Ratio Rank: 83
ALLW Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
ALLW Martin Ratio Rank: 88

GLDM

GLDM Risk / Return Rank: 88
GLDM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
GLDM Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
GLDM Omega Ratio Rank: 86
GLDM Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
GLDM Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ALLW vs. GLDM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bridgewater All Weather ETF (ALLW) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ALLW	GLDM	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.53	1.82	-0.28
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.06	2.25	-0.19
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.33	-0.02
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.34	2.71	-0.37
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	10.17	10.04	+0.13
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ALLW vs. GLDM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ALLW Sharpe Ratio is 1.53, which is comparable to the GLDM Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ALLW and GLDM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ALLW	GLDM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.53	1.82	-0.28
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	1.25	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.51	1.09	+0.42

Correlation

The correlation between ALLW and GLDM is 0.55, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

ALLW vs. GLDM - Dividend Comparison

ALLW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.45%, while GLDM has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025
ALLW SPDR Bridgewater All Weather ETF	4.45%	4.67%
GLDM SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

ALLW vs. GLDM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ALLW drawdown since its inception was -8.78%, smaller than the maximum GLDM drawdown of -21.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALLW and GLDM.

Drawdown Indicators

	ALLW	GLDM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.78%	-21.63%	+12.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.78%	-19.14%	+10.36%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-20.92%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.28%	-13.19%	+8.91%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.18%	-6.04%	+4.86%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.02%	5.16%	-3.14%

Volatility

ALLW vs. GLDM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Bridgewater All Weather ETF (ALLW) is 5.41%, while SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM) has a volatility of 11.01%. This indicates that ALLW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLDM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ALLW	GLDM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.41%	11.01%	-5.60%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.56%	24.07%	-15.51%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.08%	27.57%	-14.49%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.83%	17.65%	-4.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.83%	16.77%	-3.94%