PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RHRX vs. THRO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RHRX vs. THRO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RH Tactical Rotation ETF (RHRX) and iShares U.S. Thematic Rotation Active ETF (THRO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RHRX achieves a 18.02% return, which is significantly higher than THRO's 10.10% return.


RHRX

1D
-2.79%
1M
0.50%
YTD
18.02%
6M
17.04%
1Y
35.22%
3Y*
21.00%
5Y*
10Y*

THRO

1D
-1.58%
1M
-0.59%
YTD
10.10%
6M
8.78%
1Y
23.17%
3Y*
22.54%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RHRX vs. THRO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
RHRX
RH Tactical Rotation ETF
18.02%16.70%22.21%10.28%-20.05%1.03%
THRO
iShares U.S. Thematic Rotation Active ETF
10.10%15.04%32.03%24.40%-17.85%1.01%

Correlation

The correlation between RHRX and THRO is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2021

0.87

The correlation between RHRX and THRO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

RHRX vs. THRO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RHRX
THRO

Technology

44.9%
43.9%

Industrials

12.9%
10.9%

Communication Services

8.4%
8.9%

Basic Materials

8.3%
1.2%

Consumer Cyclical

7.6%
9.0%

Financial Services

6.8%
10.7%

Healthcare

5.1%
5.7%

Consumer Defensive

2.4%
5.7%

Energy

1.5%
3.5%

Utilities

1.1%
0.1%

Real Estate

1.0%

-

Technology

RHRX
44.9%
THRO
43.9%

Industrials

RHRX
12.9%
THRO
10.9%

Communication Services

RHRX
8.4%
THRO
8.9%

Basic Materials

RHRX
8.3%
THRO
1.2%

Consumer Cyclical

RHRX
7.6%
THRO
9.0%

Financial Services

RHRX
6.8%
THRO
10.7%

Healthcare

RHRX
5.1%
THRO
5.7%

Consumer Defensive

RHRX
2.4%
THRO
5.7%

Energy

RHRX
1.5%
THRO
3.5%

Utilities

RHRX
1.1%
THRO
0.1%

Real Estate

RHRX
1.0%
THRO

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RHRX vs. THRO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RHRX
RHRX Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
RHRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RHRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
RHRX Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
RHRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
RHRX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

THRO
THRO Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
THRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
THRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
THRO Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
THRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
THRO Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RHRX vs. THRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RH Tactical Rotation ETF (RHRX) and iShares U.S. Thematic Rotation Active ETF (THRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RHRXTHRODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.98

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.30

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.18

2.14

+3.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.38

9.26

+10.13

RHRX vs. THRO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RHRX Sharpe Ratio is 2.49, which is higher than the THRO Sharpe Ratio of 1.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RHRX and THRO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RHRX vs. THRO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RHRX drawdown since its inception was -25.33%, roughly equal to the maximum THRO drawdown of -26.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RHRX and THRO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RHRXTHRODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.33%

-26.54%

+1.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.83%

-10.87%

+4.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.90%

-19.07%

-2.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.34%

-2.91%

-0.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.87%

-6.64%

-2.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.82%

2.51%

-0.69%

Volatility

RHRX vs. THRO - Volatility Comparison

RH Tactical Rotation ETF (RHRX) has a higher volatility of 6.49% compared to iShares U.S. Thematic Rotation Active ETF (THRO) at 5.67%. This indicates that RHRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than THRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RHRXTHRODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.49%

5.67%

+0.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.22%

11.21%

+0.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.24%

13.91%

+0.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.12%

18.78%

+0.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.12%

18.78%

+0.34%

RHRX vs. THRO - Expense Ratio Comparison

RHRX has a 1.36% expense ratio, which is higher than THRO's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

RHRX vs. THRO - Dividend Comparison

RHRX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while THRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.26%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
RHRX
RH Tactical Rotation ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
THRO
iShares U.S. Thematic Rotation Active ETF
0.26%0.15%0.73%0.55%0.90%

Frequently Asked Questions


RHRX and THRO have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RHRX has higher volatility (6.49%) compared to THRO (5.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RHRX dropped -25.33% vs THRO's -26.54%.

On 3-year performance, THRO leads with 22.54% vs 21.00% for RHRX. On fees, THRO is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, THRO has been the lower-risk option at 5.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, THRO has performed better with a 22.54% return vs 21.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

THRO is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 1.36% for RHRX.

THRO has the higher dividend yield at 0.26%, compared with 0.00% for RHRX.

They also come from different issuers: Adaptive and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.36% for RHRX and 0.60% for THRO.

RHRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 1.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RHRX and THRO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer