PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RHRX vs. THIR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RHRX vs. THIR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RH Tactical Rotation ETF (RHRX) and THOR Index Rotation ETF (THIR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RHRX achieves a 18.02% return, which is significantly higher than THIR's 5.00% return.


RHRX

1D
-2.79%
1M
0.50%
YTD
18.02%
6M
17.04%
1Y
35.22%
3Y*
21.00%
5Y*
10Y*

THIR

1D
-1.51%
1M
-0.12%
YTD
5.00%
6M
3.87%
1Y
20.08%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RHRX vs. THIR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
RHRX
RH Tactical Rotation ETF
18.02%16.70%0.97%
THIR
THOR Index Rotation ETF
5.00%25.22%3.16%

Correlation

The correlation between RHRX and THIR is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2024

0.82

The correlation between RHRX and THIR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

RHRX vs. THIR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RHRX
THIR

Technology

44.9%
48.5%

Industrials

12.9%
5.2%

Communication Services

8.4%
12.7%

Basic Materials

8.3%
1.4%

Consumer Cyclical

7.6%
10.8%

Financial Services

6.8%
5.4%

Healthcare

5.1%
6.0%

Consumer Defensive

2.4%
5.7%

Energy

1.5%
1.8%

Utilities

1.1%
1.6%

Real Estate

1.0%
0.9%

Technology

RHRX
44.9%
THIR
48.5%

Industrials

RHRX
12.9%
THIR
5.2%

Communication Services

RHRX
8.4%
THIR
12.7%

Basic Materials

RHRX
8.3%
THIR
1.4%

Consumer Cyclical

RHRX
7.6%
THIR
10.8%

Financial Services

RHRX
6.8%
THIR
5.4%

Healthcare

RHRX
5.1%
THIR
6.0%

Consumer Defensive

RHRX
2.4%
THIR
5.7%

Energy

RHRX
1.5%
THIR
1.8%

Utilities

RHRX
1.1%
THIR
1.6%

Real Estate

RHRX
1.0%
THIR
0.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RHRX vs. THIR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RHRX
RHRX Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
RHRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RHRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
RHRX Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
RHRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
RHRX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

THIR
THIR Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
THIR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
THIR Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
THIR Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
THIR Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
THIR Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RHRX vs. THIR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RH Tactical Rotation ETF (RHRX) and THOR Index Rotation ETF (THIR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RHRXTHIRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.91

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.29

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.18

2.27

+2.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.38

7.82

+11.56

RHRX vs. THIR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RHRX Sharpe Ratio is 2.49, which is higher than the THIR Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RHRX and THIR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RHRX vs. THIR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RHRX drawdown since its inception was -25.33%, which is greater than THIR's maximum drawdown of -10.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RHRX and THIR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RHRXTHIRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.33%

-10.05%

-15.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.83%

-8.88%

+2.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.34%

-3.34%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.87%

-2.01%

-6.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.82%

2.57%

-0.75%

Volatility

RHRX vs. THIR - Volatility Comparison

RH Tactical Rotation ETF (RHRX) and THOR Index Rotation ETF (THIR) have volatilities of 6.49% and 6.50%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RHRXTHIRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.49%

6.50%

-0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.22%

10.20%

+1.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.24%

12.77%

+1.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.12%

13.27%

+5.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.12%

13.27%

+5.85%

RHRX vs. THIR - Expense Ratio Comparison

RHRX has a 1.36% expense ratio, which is higher than THIR's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

RHRX vs. THIR - Dividend Comparison

RHRX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while THIR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%.


PositionTTM20252024
RHRX
RH Tactical Rotation ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%
THIR
THOR Index Rotation ETF
0.34%0.35%0.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


RHRX and THIR have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

THIR has higher volatility (6.50%) compared to RHRX (6.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RHRX dropped -25.33% vs THIR's -10.05%.

On 1-year performance, RHRX leads with 35.22% vs 20.08% for THIR. On fees, THIR is cheaper at 0.70% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, RHRX has performed better with a 35.22% return vs 20.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

THIR is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 1.36% for RHRX.

THIR has the higher dividend yield at 0.34%, compared with 0.00% for RHRX.

They also come from different issuers: Adaptive and THOR. Their fees differ too: 1.36% for RHRX and 0.70% for THIR.

RHRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RHRX and THIR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer