PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RHP vs. ^GSPC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

RHP vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ryman Hospitality Properties, Inc. (RHP) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RHP achieves a 33.04% return, which is significantly higher than ^GSPC's 7.60% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with RHP having a 13.72% annualized return and ^GSPC not far behind at 13.71%.


RHP

1D
-0.74%
1M
10.96%
YTD
33.04%
6M
31.84%
1Y
29.40%
3Y*
16.78%
5Y*
11.56%
10Y*
13.72%

^GSPC

1D
-1.44%
1M
-1.45%
YTD
7.60%
6M
6.59%
1Y
22.24%
3Y*
19.20%
5Y*
11.54%
10Y*
13.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RHP vs. ^GSPC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RHP
Ryman Hospitality Properties, Inc.
33.04%-4.75%-1.13%40.36%-10.67%35.71%-19.62%35.74%0.98%15.14%
^GSPC
S&P 500 Index
7.60%16.39%23.31%24.23%-19.44%26.89%16.26%28.88%-6.24%19.42%

Correlation

The correlation between RHP and ^GSPC is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.48

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 1991

0.47

The correlation between RHP and ^GSPC shifts across timeframes, from 0.38 (1 year) to 0.54 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RHP vs. ^GSPC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RHP
RHP Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
RHP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RHP Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
RHP Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
RHP Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
RHP Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

^GSPC
^GSPC Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
^GSPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^GSPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
^GSPC Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
^GSPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
^GSPC Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RHP vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ryman Hospitality Properties, Inc. (RHP) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RHP^GSPCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.32

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.77

2.46

-0.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.73

10.92

-7.19

RHP vs. ^GSPC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RHP Sharpe Ratio is 1.26, which is comparable to the ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio of 1.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RHP and ^GSPC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RHP vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RHP drawdown since its inception was -91.53%, which is greater than ^GSPC's maximum drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RHP and ^GSPC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RHP^GSPCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-91.53%

-56.78%

-34.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.72%

-9.10%

-7.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.07%

-18.90%

-13.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.07%

-25.43%

-6.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-84.58%

-33.92%

-50.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.74%

-3.21%

+2.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.99%

-10.71%

-10.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.91%

2.04%

+5.87%

Volatility

RHP vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison

Ryman Hospitality Properties, Inc. (RHP) has a higher volatility of 5.65% compared to S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) at 4.89%. This indicates that RHP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RHP^GSPCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.65%

4.89%

+0.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.89%

9.93%

+6.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.50%

12.57%

+10.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.86%

17.00%

+13.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

43.89%

18.08%

+25.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


RHP and ^GSPC have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RHP has higher volatility (5.65%) compared to ^GSPC (4.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RHP dropped -91.53% vs ^GSPC's -56.78%.

^GSPC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RHP and ^GSPC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer