PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RHP vs. JPM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

RHP vs. JPM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ryman Hospitality Properties, Inc. (RHP) and JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RHP achieves a 44.45% return, which is significantly higher than JPM's 10.73% return. Over the past 10 years, RHP has underperformed JPM with an annualized return of 13.22%, while JPM has yielded a comparatively higher 21.80% annualized return.


RHP

1D
0.30%
1M
4.54%
6M
44.33%
YTD
44.45%
1Y
50.82%
3Y*
17.36%
5Y*
15.38%
10Y*
13.22%
ALL TIME*
10.50%

JPM

1D
0.27%
1M
5.65%
6M
16.11%
YTD
10.73%
1Y
23.90%
3Y*
33.72%
5Y*
21.31%
10Y*
21.80%
ALL TIME*
12.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$2.69B$3.19B$3.04B
$65.69M$65.37M$74.52M

RHP vs. JPM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RHP
Ryman Hospitality Properties, Inc.
44.45%-4.75%-1.13%40.36%-10.67%35.71%-19.62%35.74%0.98%15.14%
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
10.73%37.27%44.29%30.63%-12.64%27.75%-5.53%47.26%-6.62%26.76%

Correlation

The correlation between RHP and JPM is 0.29, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.39

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.42

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 1991

0.37

The correlation between RHP and JPM shifts across timeframes, from 0.29 (1 year) to 0.44 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

RHP:

$8.43B

JPM:

$942.62B

EPS

RHP:

$6.02

JPM:

$23.29

PE Ratio

RHP:

22.21

JPM:

15.10

PEG Ratio

RHP:

0.93

JPM:

1.67

PS Ratio

RHP:

2.21

JPM:

3.30

Total Revenue (TTM)

RHP:

$2.65B

JPM:

$297.63B

Gross Profit (TTM)

RHP:

$472.93M

JPM:

$186.33B

EBITDA (TTM)

RHP:

$673.88M

JPM:

$90.84B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RHP vs. JPM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RHP
RHP Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
RHP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RHP Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
RHP Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
RHP Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
RHP Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

JPM
JPM Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
JPM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPM Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
JPM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPM Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RHP vs. JPM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ryman Hospitality Properties, Inc. (RHP) and JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RHPJPMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.17

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.33

1.36

+1.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.01

3.24

+4.77

RHP vs. JPM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RHP Sharpe Ratio is 1.99, which is higher than the JPM Sharpe Ratio of 0.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RHP and JPM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RHP vs. JPM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RHP drawdown since its inception was -91.53%, which is greater than JPM's maximum drawdown of -76.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RHP and JPM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RHPJPMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-91.53%

-76.16%

-15.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.29%

-15.47%

+1.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.07%

-24.42%

-7.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.07%

-38.77%

+6.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-84.58%

-43.63%

-40.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.72%

-1.54%

-0.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.93%

-17.56%

-3.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.94%

6.51%

-0.57%

Volatility

RHP vs. JPM - Volatility Comparison

Ryman Hospitality Properties, Inc. (RHP) and JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) have volatilities of 6.47% and 6.60%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RHPJPMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.47%

6.60%

-0.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.82%

16.70%

+1.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.08%

22.50%

+1.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.49%

24.46%

+6.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

43.89%

27.33%

+16.56%

Dividends

RHP vs. JPM - Dividend Comparison

RHP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.55%, more than JPM's 1.71% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.71%1.72%1.92%2.38%2.98%2.34%2.83%2.37%2.54%1.91%2.13%2.54%
RHP
Ryman Hospitality Properties, Inc.
3.55%4.91%4.26%3.50%0.43%0.00%1.40%4.15%5.10%4.64%4.76%5.23%

Financials

RHP vs. JPM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ryman Hospitality Properties, Inc. and JPMorgan Chase & Co.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

RHP vs. JPM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Ryman Hospitality Properties, Inc. and JPMorgan Chase & Co. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

RHP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Ryman Hospitality Properties, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 664.57M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

JPM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, JPMorgan Chase & Co. reported a gross profit of 54.83B and revenue of 82.46B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 66.5%.

RHP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Ryman Hospitality Properties, Inc. reported an operating income of 137.80M and revenue of 664.57M, resulting in an operating margin of 20.7%.

JPM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, JPMorgan Chase & Co. reported an operating income of 27.52B and revenue of 82.46B, resulting in an operating margin of 33.4%.

RHP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Ryman Hospitality Properties, Inc. reported a net income of 83.20M and revenue of 664.57M, resulting in a net margin of 12.5%.

JPM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, JPMorgan Chase & Co. reported a net income of 21.16B and revenue of 82.46B, resulting in a net margin of 25.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


RHP and JPM have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JPM has higher volatility (6.60%) compared to RHP (6.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RHP dropped -91.53% vs JPM's -76.16%.

RHP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RHP and JPM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer