RHP vs. SLVM
RHP (Ryman Hospitality Properties, Inc.) and SLVM (Sylvamo Corporation) are both stocks. RHP operates in REIT - Hotel & Motel (Real Estate), while SLVM operates in Paper & Paper Products (Basic Materials). Over the past 3 years, RHP returned 9.99%/yr vs 1.26%/yr for SLVM. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
RHP vs. SLVM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RHP achieves a 21.94% return, which is significantly higher than SLVM's -18.20% return.
RHP
- 1D
- -1.03%
- 1M
- 8.03%
- YTD
- 21.94%
- 6M
- 23.70%
- 1Y
- 22.36%
- 3Y*
- 9.99%
- 5Y*
- 12.18%
- 10Y*
- 12.42%
SLVM
- 1D
- -0.39%
- 1M
- -8.40%
- YTD
- -18.20%
- 6M
- -18.26%
- 1Y
- -24.59%
- 3Y*
- 1.26%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RHP vs. SLVM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RHP Ryman Hospitality Properties, Inc. | 21.94% | -4.75% | -1.13% | 40.36% | -10.67% | 5.86% |
SLVM Sylvamo Corporation | -18.20% | -37.06% | 64.70% | 4.21% | 75.25% | -15.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between RHP and SLVM is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 4, 2021 | 0.40 |
Fundamentals
RHP:
$5.38
SLVM:
$2.52
RHP:
21.16
SLVM:
15.33
RHP:
0.89
SLVM:
2.26
RHP:
2.10
SLVM:
0.48
RHP:
$2.65B
SLVM:
$3.29B
RHP:
$472.93M
SLVM:
$565.00M
RHP:
$673.88M
SLVM:
$338.00M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RHP vs. SLVM — Risk / Return Rank
RHP
SLVM
RHP vs. SLVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ryman Hospitality Properties, Inc. (RHP) and Sylvamo Corporation (SLVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RHP | SLVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.95 | -0.62 | +1.57 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.51 | -0.69 | +2.20 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 0.91 | +0.25 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.34 | -0.73 | +2.07 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.83 | -1.47 | +4.30 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RHP | SLVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 | -0.62 | +1.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.28 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.24 | 0.14 | +0.10 |
Drawdowns
RHP vs. SLVM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RHP drawdown since its inception was -91.53%, which is greater than SLVM's maximum drawdown of -60.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RHP and SLVM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RHP | SLVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.53% | -60.56% | -30.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.72% | -33.87% | +17.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.07% | -60.56% | +28.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.07% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -84.58% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.74% | -57.48% | +55.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.02% | -22.40% | +1.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.92% | 16.75% | -8.83% |
Volatility
RHP vs. SLVM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Ryman Hospitality Properties, Inc. (RHP) is 6.66%, while Sylvamo Corporation (SLVM) has a volatility of 12.62%. This indicates that RHP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLVM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RHP | SLVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.66% | 12.62% | -5.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.98% | 26.39% | -9.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.66% | 40.07% | -16.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.93% | 43.78% | -12.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 43.87% | 43.78% | +0.09% |
Dividends
RHP vs. SLVM - Dividend Comparison
RHP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.13%, less than SLVM's 4.66% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RHP Ryman Hospitality Properties, Inc. | 4.13% | 4.91% | 4.26% | 3.50% | 0.43% | 0.00% | 1.40% | 4.15% | 5.10% | 4.64% | 4.76% | 5.23% |
SLVM Sylvamo Corporation | 4.66% | 3.74% | 1.90% | 2.75% | 0.46% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
RHP vs. SLVM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ryman Hospitality Properties, Inc. and Sylvamo Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
RHP vs. SLVM - Profitability Comparison
RHP - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ryman Hospitality Properties, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 664.57M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
SLVM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sylvamo Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 755.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
RHP - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ryman Hospitality Properties, Inc. reported an operating income of 137.80M and revenue of 664.57M, resulting in an operating margin of 20.7%.
SLVM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sylvamo Corporation reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 755.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
RHP - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ryman Hospitality Properties, Inc. reported a net income of 83.20M and revenue of 664.57M, resulting in a net margin of 12.5%.
SLVM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sylvamo Corporation reported a net income of -3.00M and revenue of 755.00M, resulting in a net margin of -0.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
RHP and SLVM have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SLVM has higher volatility (12.62%) compared to RHP (6.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RHP dropped -91.53% vs SLVM's -60.56%.
RHP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.95 vs -0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RHP and SLVM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer