PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RHM.DE vs. EMIM.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RHM.DE vs. EMIM.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Rheinmetall AG (RHM.DE) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (EMIM.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

RHM.DE is traded in EUR, while EMIM.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the EMIM.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RHM.DE achieves a -22.00% return, which is significantly lower than EMIM.L's 24.15% return. Over the past 10 years, RHM.DE has outperformed EMIM.L with an annualized return of 38.55%, while EMIM.L has yielded a comparatively lower 10.21% annualized return.


RHM.DE

1D
-1.18%
1M
7.49%
YTD
-22.00%
6M
-24.77%
1Y
-30.34%
3Y*
70.90%
5Y*
71.68%
10Y*
38.55%

EMIM.L

1D
2.76%
1M
2.09%
YTD
24.15%
6M
27.50%
1Y
42.84%
3Y*
18.71%
5Y*
8.43%
10Y*
10.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RHM.DE vs. EMIM.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RHM.DE
Rheinmetall AG
-22.00%155.27%116.51%56.82%128.13%-1.77%-12.43%35.55%-26.03%68.49%
EMIM.L
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc)
24.15%16.91%14.45%7.15%-14.80%7.30%8.67%19.86%-10.44%19.81%

Correlation

The correlation between RHM.DE and EMIM.L is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2014

0.34

The correlation between RHM.DE and EMIM.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.17 (3 years) to 0.34 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RHM.DE vs. EMIM.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RHM.DE
RHM.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
RHM.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RHM.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
RHM.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
RHM.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
RHM.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

EMIM.L
EMIM.L Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
EMIM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMIM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMIM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
EMIM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMIM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RHM.DE vs. EMIM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rheinmetall AG (RHM.DE) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (EMIM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RHM.DEEMIM.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.91

1.44

-0.53

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.70

4.00

-4.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.53

13.91

-15.44

RHM.DE vs. EMIM.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RHM.DE Sharpe Ratio is -0.68, which is lower than the EMIM.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RHM.DE and EMIM.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RHM.DE vs. EMIM.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RHM.DE drawdown since its inception was -76.51%, which is greater than EMIM.L's maximum drawdown of -34.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RHM.DE and EMIM.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RHM.DEEMIM.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.51%

-34.80%

-41.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-43.11%

-10.65%

-32.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-43.11%

-17.95%

-25.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.11%

-22.35%

-20.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-62.18%

-32.44%

-29.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-38.77%

-3.48%

-35.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.20%

-9.29%

-11.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.80%

3.07%

+16.73%

Volatility

RHM.DE vs. EMIM.L - Volatility Comparison

Rheinmetall AG (RHM.DE) has a higher volatility of 11.36% compared to iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (EMIM.L) at 7.32%. This indicates that RHM.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMIM.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RHM.DEEMIM.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.36%

7.32%

+4.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.58%

15.25%

+18.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

44.66%

18.05%

+26.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

41.96%

16.47%

+25.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.77%

18.19%

+19.58%

Dividends

RHM.DE vs. EMIM.L - Dividend Comparison

RHM.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%, while EMIM.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EMIM.L
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RHM.DE
Rheinmetall AG
0.95%0.52%0.93%1.50%1.77%2.41%2.77%2.05%2.20%1.37%1.72%0.49%

Frequently Asked Questions


RHM.DE and EMIM.L have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RHM.DE and EMIM.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer