RGYY vs. BCI

Last updated Jul 3, 2026

RGYY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST RGTI ETF) and BCI (abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RGYY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while BCI is a Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return. RGYY is actively managed, while BCI is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions. RGYY charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.26%/yr for BCI.

Performance

RGYY vs. BCI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares YieldBOOST RGTI ETF (RGYY) and abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RGYY achieves a -28.19% return, which is significantly lower than BCI's 14.18% return.

RGYY

• 1D: -1.05%
• 1M: -5.21%
• 6M: -28.19%
• YTD: -28.19%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BCI

• 1D: 0.22%
• 1M: -9.97%
• 6M: 14.18%
• YTD: 14.18%
• 1Y: 22.87%
• 3Y*: 11.27%
• 5Y*: 8.67%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RGYY vs. BCI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
RGYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST RGTI ETF	-28.19%	-11.14%
BCI abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF	14.18%	2.05%

Correlation

The correlation between RGYY and BCI is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 25, 2025	-0.05

Return for Risk

RGYY vs. BCI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RGYY

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BCI

BCI Risk / Return Rank: 41
BCI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
BCI Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
BCI Omega Ratio Rank: 43
BCI Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
BCI Martin Ratio Rank: 41

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RGYY vs. BCI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST RGTI ETF (RGYY) and abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RGYY	BCI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.34	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.83	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.24	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	1.55	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	5.64	—

Drawdowns

RGYY vs. BCI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RGYY drawdown since its inception was -37.05%, which is greater than BCI's maximum drawdown of -32.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RGYY and BCI.

Drawdown Indicators

	RGYY	BCI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.05%	-32.69%	-4.36%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-14.82%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-14.82%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-26.50%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-36.89%	-13.93%	-22.96%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-24.56%	-11.99%	-12.57%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	4.07%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	RGYY	BCI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	4.03%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	15.00%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	31.14%	17.18%	+13.96%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	31.14%	16.83%	+14.31%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	31.14%	15.65%	+15.49%

RGYY vs. BCI - Expense Ratio Comparison

RGYY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than BCI's 0.26% expense ratio.

Dividends

RGYY vs. BCI - Dividend Comparison

RGYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 133.91%, more than BCI's 14.44% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BCI abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF	14.44%	16.49%	3.29%	3.93%	19.98%	19.43%	0.68%	1.47%	1.13%	5.02%
RGYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST RGTI ETF	133.91%	15.50%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RGYY and BCI in my portfolio?

RGYY and BCI have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, RGYY or BCI?

On fees, BCI is cheaper at 0.26% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, RGYY or BCI?

BCI is cheaper with a 0.26% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for RGYY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RGYY or BCI?

RGYY has the higher dividend yield at 133.91%, compared with 14.44% for BCI.

What is the main difference between RGYY and BCI?

RGYY is categorized as Derivative Income, while BCI is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Aberdeen. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for RGYY and 0.26% for BCI.