RGYY vs. BCI
RGYY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST RGTI ETF) and BCI (abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RGYY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while BCI is a Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return. RGYY is actively managed, while BCI is passively managed. Their -0.05 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. RGYY charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.26%/yr for BCI.
Performance
RGYY vs. BCI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RGYY achieves a -32.02% return, which is significantly lower than BCI's 22.53% return.
RGYY
- 1D
- 0.67%
- 1M
- -5.32%
- 6M
- -25.47%
- YTD
- -32.02%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
BCI
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- 7.31%
- 6M
- 10.17%
- YTD
- 22.53%
- 1Y
- 35.51%
- 3Y*
- 11.89%
- 5Y*
- 10.01%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 7.06%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $33.67M | $55.32M | $39.13M | |
| $182.44K | $182.78K | $152.25K |
RGYY vs. BCI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
RGYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST RGTI ETF | -32.02% | -11.14% |
BCI abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF | 22.53% | 2.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between RGYY and BCI is -0.05, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 25, 2025 | -0.05 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RGYY vs. BCI — Risk / Return Rank
RGYY
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BCI
RGYY vs. BCI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST RGTI ETF (RGYY) and abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RGYY | BCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.35 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.37 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 7.60 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RGYY vs. BCI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RGYY drawdown since its inception was -41.66%, which is greater than BCI's maximum drawdown of -32.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RGYY and BCI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RGYY | BCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.66% | -32.69% | -8.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -14.82% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -14.82% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.50% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -40.24% | -7.64% | -32.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.35% | -11.96% | -14.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.61% | — |
Volatility
RGYY vs. BCI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RGYY | BCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.02% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 15.08% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.92% | 17.55% | +12.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.92% | 16.85% | +13.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.92% | 15.68% | +14.24% |
RGYY vs. BCI - Expense Ratio Comparison
RGYY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than BCI's 0.26% expense ratio.
Dividends
RGYY vs. BCI - Dividend Comparison
RGYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 159.78%, more than BCI's 13.46% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCI abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF | 13.46% | 16.49% | 3.29% | 3.93% | 19.98% | 19.43% | 0.68% | 1.47% | 1.13% | 5.02% |
RGYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST RGTI ETF | 159.78% | 15.50% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RGYY and BCI have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BCI is cheaper at 0.26% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BCI is cheaper with a 0.26% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for RGYY.
RGYY has the higher dividend yield at 159.78%, compared with 13.46% for BCI.
RGYY is categorized as Derivative Income, while BCI is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Aberdeen. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for RGYY and 0.26% for BCI.
Find the right allocation for RGYY and BCI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer