RGYY vs. CMDY
RGYY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST RGTI ETF) and CMDY (iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RGYY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while CMDY is a Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Total Return Index. RGYY is actively managed, while CMDY is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.08, they often move in opposite directions. RGYY charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for CMDY.
Performance
RGYY vs. CMDY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RGYY achieves a -24.93% return, which is significantly lower than CMDY's 15.88% return.
RGYY
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 0.22%
- YTD
- -24.93%
- 6M
- -31.29%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CMDY
- 1D
- -0.65%
- 1M
- -8.01%
- YTD
- 15.88%
- 6M
- 15.95%
- 1Y
- 21.57%
- 3Y*
- 11.93%
- 5Y*
- 9.37%
- 10Y*
- —
RGYY vs. CMDY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
RGYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST RGTI ETF | -24.93% | -11.14% |
CMDY iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF | 15.88% | 2.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between RGYY and CMDY is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 25, 2025 | -0.08 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RGYY vs. CMDY — Risk / Return Rank
RGYY
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
CMDY
RGYY vs. CMDY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST RGTI ETF (RGYY) and iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF (CMDY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RGYY | CMDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.24 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.92 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 7.24 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RGYY vs. CMDY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RGYY drawdown since its inception was -37.05%, which is greater than CMDY's maximum drawdown of -31.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RGYY and CMDY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RGYY | CMDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.05% | -31.19% | -5.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -11.29% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -11.29% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.56% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -34.01% | -11.29% | -22.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.93% | -13.11% | -10.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.21% | — |
Volatility
RGYY vs. CMDY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RGYY | CMDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.50% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 14.39% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.63% | 16.32% | +15.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.63% | 15.76% | +15.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.63% | 14.63% | +17.00% |
RGYY vs. CMDY - Expense Ratio Comparison
RGYY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than CMDY's 0.28% expense ratio.
Dividends
RGYY vs. CMDY - Dividend Comparison
RGYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 119.63%, more than CMDY's 11.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMDY iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF | 11.13% | 12.89% | 4.23% | 5.10% | 3.98% | 16.09% | 0.15% | 2.21% | 1.73% |
RGYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST RGTI ETF | 119.63% | 15.50% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RGYY and CMDY have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CMDY is cheaper at 0.28% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CMDY is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for RGYY.
RGYY has the higher dividend yield at 119.63%, compared with 11.13% for CMDY.
RGYY is categorized as Derivative Income, while CMDY is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for RGYY and 0.28% for CMDY.
Find the right allocation for RGYY and CMDY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer