RGYY vs. BAR
RGYY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST RGTI ETF) and BAR (GraniteShares Gold Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - RGYY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while BAR is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM ($/ozt). RGYY is actively managed, while BAR is passively managed. Their 0.25 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. RGYY charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for BAR.
Performance
RGYY vs. BAR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RGYY achieves a -32.02% return, which is significantly lower than BAR's -6.21% return.
RGYY
- 1D
- 0.67%
- 1M
- -5.32%
- 6M
- -25.47%
- YTD
- -32.02%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
BAR
- 1D
- -1.51%
- 1M
- -1.73%
- 6M
- -16.49%
- YTD
- -6.21%
- 1Y
- 20.39%
- 3Y*
- 27.47%
- 5Y*
- 17.20%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 13.26%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $8.48M | $7.76M | $9.82M | |
| $182.44K | $182.78K | $152.25K |
RGYY vs. BAR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
RGYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST RGTI ETF | -32.02% | -11.14% |
BAR GraniteShares Gold Trust | -6.21% | 4.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between RGYY and BAR is 0.25, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 25, 2025 | 0.25 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RGYY vs. BAR — Risk / Return Rank
RGYY
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BAR
RGYY vs. BAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST RGTI ETF (RGYY) and GraniteShares Gold Trust (BAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RGYY | BAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.17 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.87 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 1.88 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RGYY vs. BAR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RGYY drawdown since its inception was -41.66%, which is greater than BAR's maximum drawdown of -26.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RGYY and BAR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RGYY | BAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.66% | -26.32% | -15.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -26.32% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -26.32% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.32% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -40.24% | -25.04% | -15.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.35% | -6.75% | -19.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 12.15% | — |
Volatility
RGYY vs. BAR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RGYY | BAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.32% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 23.33% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.92% | 27.91% | +2.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.92% | 18.38% | +11.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.92% | 16.61% | +13.31% |
RGYY vs. BAR - Expense Ratio Comparison
RGYY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than BAR's 0.17% expense ratio.
Dividends
RGYY vs. BAR - Dividend Comparison
RGYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 159.78%, while BAR has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
BAR GraniteShares Gold Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RGYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST RGTI ETF | 159.78% | 15.50% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RGYY and BAR have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BAR is cheaper at 0.17% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BAR is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for RGYY.
RGYY has the higher dividend yield at 159.78%, compared with 0.00% for BAR.
RGYY is categorized as Derivative Income, while BAR is Gold. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for RGYY and 0.17% for BAR.
Find the right allocation for RGYY and BAR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer