RGYY vs. AMDY

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

RGYY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST RGTI ETF) and AMDY (YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.42 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. RGYY charges 1.07%/yr vs 1.23%/yr for AMDY.

Performance

RGYY vs. AMDY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares YieldBOOST RGTI ETF (RGYY) and YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF (AMDY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RGYY achieves a -32.02% return, which is significantly lower than AMDY's 87.43% return.

RGYY

• 1D: 0.67%
• 1M: -5.32%
• 6M: -25.47%
• YTD: -32.02%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

AMDY

• 1D: -1.50%
• 1M: -8.47%
• 6M: 81.07%
• YTD: 87.43%
• 1Y: 133.24%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 47.02%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
AMDY YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF	$22.93M	$23.50M	$23.54M
RGYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST RGTI ETF	$182.44K	$182.78K	$152.25K

RGYY vs. AMDY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
RGYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST RGTI ETF	-32.02%	-11.14%
AMDY YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF	87.43%	2.16%

Correlation

The correlation between RGYY and AMDY is 0.42, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 25, 2025	0.42

Return for Risk

RGYY vs. AMDY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RGYY

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

AMDY

AMDY Risk / Return Rank: 86
AMDY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
AMDY Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
AMDY Omega Ratio Rank: 84
AMDY Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
AMDY Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RGYY vs. AMDY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST RGTI ETF (RGYY) and YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF (AMDY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RGYY	AMDY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.13	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.75	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.36	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	4.63	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	10.02	—

Drawdowns

RGYY vs. AMDY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RGYY drawdown since its inception was -41.66%, smaller than the maximum AMDY drawdown of -53.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RGYY and AMDY.

Drawdown Indicators

	RGYY	AMDY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.66%	-53.92%	+12.26%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-27.59%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-40.24%	-15.82%	-24.42%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-26.35%	-17.40%	-8.95%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	12.72%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	RGYY	AMDY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	21.43%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	48.49%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	29.92%	60.09%	-30.17%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.92%	48.06%	-18.14%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	29.92%	48.06%	-18.14%

RGYY vs. AMDY - Expense Ratio Comparison

RGYY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is lower than AMDY's 1.23% expense ratio.

Dividends

RGYY vs. AMDY - Dividend Comparison

RGYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 159.78%, more than AMDY's 76.77% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
AMDY YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF	76.77%	80.68%	109.98%	6.68%
RGYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST RGTI ETF	159.78%	15.50%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RGYY and AMDY in my portfolio?

RGYY and AMDY have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, RGYY or AMDY?

On fees, RGYY is cheaper at 1.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, RGYY or AMDY?

RGYY is cheaper with a 1.07% expense ratio, compared with 1.23% for AMDY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RGYY or AMDY?

RGYY has the higher dividend yield at 159.78%, compared with 76.77% for AMDY.

What is the main difference between RGYY and AMDY?

They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for RGYY and 1.23% for AMDY.