RGTZ vs. EMTY

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

RGTZ (Defiance Daily Target 2X Short RGTI ETF) and EMTY (ProShares Decline of the Retail Store ETF) are both Inverse Equities funds. RGTZ is actively managed, while EMTY is passively managed. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RGTZ charges 1.29%/yr vs 0.66%/yr for EMTY.

Performance

RGTZ vs. EMTY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Daily Target 2X Short RGTI ETF (RGTZ) and ProShares Decline of the Retail Store ETF (EMTY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RGTZ achieves a -85.91% return, which is significantly lower than EMTY's 1.09% return.

RGTZ

• 1D: 20.31%
• 1M: -76.68%
• YTD: -85.91%
• 6M: -85.92%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EMTY

• 1D: -0.32%
• 1M: 1.81%
• YTD: 1.09%
• 6M: 3.80%
• 1Y: 1.60%
• 3Y*: -4.69%
• 5Y*: -2.87%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RGTZ vs. EMTY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
RGTZ Defiance Daily Target 2X Short RGTI ETF	-85.91%	32.65%
EMTY ProShares Decline of the Retail Store ETF	1.09%	3.15%

Correlation

The correlation between RGTZ and EMTY is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2025	0.20

Return for Risk

RGTZ vs. EMTY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMTY

EMTY Risk / Return Rank: 10
EMTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
EMTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
EMTY Omega Ratio Rank: 10
EMTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
EMTY Martin Ratio Rank: 10

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RGTZ vs. EMTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Short RGTI ETF (RGTZ) and ProShares Decline of the Retail Store ETF (EMTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RGTZ	EMTY	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	0.09	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.13	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.43	-0.43	0.00

Drawdowns

RGTZ vs. EMTY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RGTZ drawdown since its inception was -92.92%, which is greater than EMTY's maximum drawdown of -77.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RGTZ and EMTY.

Drawdown Indicators

	RGTZ	EMTY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-92.92%	-77.62%	-15.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-14.00%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-30.83%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-30.83%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-91.48%	-74.77%	-16.71%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-40.13%	-54.01%	+13.88%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	8.11%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	RGTZ	EMTY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	6.00%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	12.40%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	218.54%	17.71%	+200.83%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	218.54%	22.36%	+196.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	218.54%	25.67%	+192.87%

RGTZ vs. EMTY - Expense Ratio Comparison

RGTZ has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than EMTY's 0.66% expense ratio.

Dividends

RGTZ vs. EMTY - Dividend Comparison

RGTZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EMTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.45%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EMTY ProShares Decline of the Retail Store ETF	3.45%	3.83%	6.00%	4.41%	0.65%	0.00%	0.07%	0.82%	0.62%	0.03%
RGTZ Defiance Daily Target 2X Short RGTI ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RGTZ and EMTY in my portfolio?

RGTZ and EMTY have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, RGTZ or EMTY?

On fees, EMTY is cheaper at 0.66% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, RGTZ or EMTY?

EMTY is cheaper with a 0.66% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for RGTZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RGTZ or EMTY?

EMTY has the higher dividend yield at 3.45%, compared with 0.00% for RGTZ.

What is the main difference between RGTZ and EMTY?

They also come from different issuers: Defiance ETFs and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 1.29% for RGTZ and 0.66% for EMTY.