RGTX vs. XDSQ
RGTX (Defiance Daily Target 2X Long RGTI ETF) and XDSQ (Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, RGTX returned -6.41% vs 15.98% for XDSQ. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RGTX charges 1.29%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for XDSQ.
Performance
RGTX vs. XDSQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RGTX achieves a -33.35% return, which is significantly lower than XDSQ's 2.80% return.
RGTX
- 1D
- -20.63%
- 1M
- 51.50%
- YTD
- -33.35%
- 6M
- -56.81%
- 1Y
- -6.41%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XDSQ
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 1.59%
- YTD
- 2.80%
- 6M
- 3.86%
- 1Y
- 15.98%
- 3Y*
- 15.02%
- 5Y*
- 9.80%
- 10Y*
- —
RGTX vs. XDSQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
RGTX Defiance Daily Target 2X Long RGTI ETF | -33.35% | 153.12% |
XDSQ Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF | 2.80% | 19.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between RGTX and XDSQ is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2025 | 0.38 |
RGTX vs. XDSQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
RGTX
XDSQ
Technology
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
RGTX
XDSQ
Basic Materials
RGTX
-
XDSQ
Communication Services
RGTX
-
XDSQ
Consumer Cyclical
RGTX
-
XDSQ
Consumer Defensive
RGTX
-
XDSQ
Energy
RGTX
-
XDSQ
Financial Services
RGTX
-
XDSQ
Healthcare
RGTX
-
XDSQ
Industrials
RGTX
-
XDSQ
Real Estate
RGTX
-
XDSQ
Utilities
RGTX
-
XDSQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RGTX vs. XDSQ — Risk / Return Rank
RGTX
XDSQ
RGTX vs. XDSQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Long RGTI ETF (RGTX) and Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF (XDSQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RGTX | XDSQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.32 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.07 | 1.67 | -1.74 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.09 | 7.97 | -8.06 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RGTX | XDSQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.03 | 1.52 | -1.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.65 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.25 | 0.69 | -0.44 |
Drawdowns
RGTX vs. XDSQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RGTX drawdown since its inception was -97.33%, which is greater than XDSQ's maximum drawdown of -26.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RGTX and XDSQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RGTX | XDSQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.33% | -26.06% | -71.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -97.33% | -9.60% | -87.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.15% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.06% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -93.10% | 0.00% | -93.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -55.03% | -4.96% | -50.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 70.91% | 2.01% | +68.90% |
Volatility
RGTX vs. XDSQ - Volatility Comparison
Defiance Daily Target 2X Long RGTI ETF (RGTX) has a higher volatility of 83.08% compared to Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF (XDSQ) at 0.57%. This indicates that RGTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDSQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RGTX | XDSQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 83.08% | 0.57% | +82.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 139.30% | 8.40% | +130.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 215.89% | 10.56% | +205.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 223.72% | 15.27% | +208.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 223.72% | 15.10% | +208.62% |
RGTX vs. XDSQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
RGTX has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than XDSQ's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
RGTX vs. XDSQ - Dividend Comparison
RGTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, while XDSQ has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
RGTX Defiance Daily Target 2X Long RGTI ETF | 0.82% | 0.55% |
XDSQ Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RGTX and XDSQ have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RGTX has higher volatility (83.08%) compared to XDSQ (0.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RGTX dropped -97.33% vs XDSQ's -26.06%.
On 1-year performance, XDSQ leads with 15.98% vs -6.41% for RGTX. On fees, XDSQ is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, XDSQ has been the lower-risk option at 0.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, XDSQ has performed better with a 15.98% return vs -6.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XDSQ is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for RGTX.
RGTX has the higher dividend yield at 0.82%, compared with 0.00% for XDSQ.
They also come from different issuers: Defiance and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 1.29% for RGTX and 0.79% for XDSQ.
XDSQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.52 vs -0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RGTX and XDSQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer