PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RGTX vs. LINT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RGTX vs. LINT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Daily Target 2X Long RGTI ETF (RGTX) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RGTX achieves a -65.29% return, which is significantly lower than LINT's 753.04% return.


RGTX

1D
-12.00%
1M
-53.67%
YTD
-65.29%
6M
-72.18%
1Y
-38.90%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

LINT

1D
1.08%
1M
6.51%
YTD
753.04%
6M
785.54%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RGTX vs. LINT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
RGTX
Defiance Daily Target 2X Long RGTI ETF
-65.29%-37.55%
LINT
Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares
753.04%5.81%

Correlation

The correlation between RGTX and LINT is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025

0.31

RGTX vs. LINT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RGTX
LINT

Technology

100.0%
100.0%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

RGTX
100.0%
LINT
100.0%

Basic Materials

RGTX

-

LINT

-

Communication Services

RGTX

-

LINT

-

Consumer Cyclical

RGTX

-

LINT

-

Consumer Defensive

RGTX

-

LINT

-

Energy

RGTX

-

LINT

-

Financial Services

RGTX

-

LINT

-

Healthcare

RGTX

-

LINT

-

Industrials

RGTX

-

LINT

-

Real Estate

RGTX

-

LINT

-

Utilities

RGTX

-

LINT

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RGTX vs. LINT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RGTX
RGTX Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
RGTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RGTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
RGTX Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
RGTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
RGTX Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

LINT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RGTX vs. LINT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Long RGTI ETF (RGTX) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RGTXLINTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.52

RGTX vs. LINT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RGTX vs. LINT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RGTX drawdown since its inception was -97.33%, which is greater than LINT's maximum drawdown of -49.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RGTX and LINT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RGTXLINTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.33%

-49.54%

-47.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-97.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-96.41%

-12.02%

-84.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-56.80%

-20.37%

-36.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

74.46%

Volatility

RGTX vs. LINT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RGTXLINTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

64.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

140.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

218.82%

167.69%

+51.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

222.94%

167.69%

+55.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

222.94%

167.69%

+55.25%

RGTX vs. LINT - Expense Ratio Comparison

RGTX has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than LINT's 0.97% expense ratio.


Dividends

RGTX vs. LINT - Dividend Comparison

RGTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.57%, more than LINT's 0.32% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


RGTX and LINT have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LINT is cheaper at 0.97% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LINT is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for RGTX.

RGTX has the higher dividend yield at 1.57%, compared with 0.32% for LINT.

They also come from different issuers: Defiance and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 1.29% for RGTX and 0.97% for LINT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RGTX and LINT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer