PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RGTX vs. BIL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RGTX vs. BIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Daily Target 2X Long RGTI ETF (RGTX) and SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RGTX achieves a -33.35% return, which is significantly lower than BIL's 1.49% return.


RGTX

1D
-20.63%
1M
51.50%
YTD
-33.35%
6M
-56.81%
1Y
-6.41%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BIL

1D
0.02%
1M
0.28%
YTD
1.49%
6M
1.77%
1Y
3.87%
3Y*
4.64%
5Y*
3.41%
10Y*
2.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RGTX vs. BIL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between RGTX and BIL is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2025

-0.11

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RGTX vs. BIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RGTX
RGTX Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
RGTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RGTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
RGTX Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
RGTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
RGTX Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

BIL
BIL Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
BIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIL Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
BIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIL Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RGTX vs. BIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Long RGTI ETF (RGTX) and SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RGTXBILDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-19.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-172.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

87.91

-86.73

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.07

355.35

-355.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.09

2,817.77

-2,817.86

RGTX vs. BIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RGTX Sharpe Ratio is -0.03, which is lower than the BIL Sharpe Ratio of 19.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RGTX and BIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RGTXBILDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.03

19.71

-19.74

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

13.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

8.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

2.78

-2.52

Drawdowns

RGTX vs. BIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RGTX drawdown since its inception was -97.33%, which is greater than BIL's maximum drawdown of -0.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RGTX and BIL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RGTXBILDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.33%

-0.78%

-96.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-97.33%

-0.01%

-97.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-0.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-0.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-93.10%

0.00%

-93.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-55.03%

-0.26%

-54.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

70.91%

0.00%

+70.91%

Volatility

RGTX vs. BIL - Volatility Comparison

Defiance Daily Target 2X Long RGTI ETF (RGTX) has a higher volatility of 83.08% compared to SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL) at 0.05%. This indicates that RGTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RGTXBILDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

83.08%

0.05%

+83.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

139.30%

0.13%

+139.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

215.89%

0.20%

+215.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

223.72%

0.26%

+223.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

223.72%

0.26%

+223.46%

RGTX vs. BIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

RGTX has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than BIL's 0.14% expense ratio.


Dividends

RGTX vs. BIL - Dividend Comparison

RGTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, less than BIL's 3.86% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BIL
SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF
3.86%4.13%5.03%4.92%1.35%0.00%0.30%2.05%1.66%0.68%0.07%
RGTX
Defiance Daily Target 2X Long RGTI ETF
0.82%0.55%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


RGTX and BIL have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RGTX has higher volatility (83.08%) compared to BIL (0.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RGTX dropped -97.33% vs BIL's -0.78%.

On 1-year performance, BIL leads with 3.87% vs -6.41% for RGTX. On fees, BIL is cheaper at 0.14% per year. On volatility, BIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BIL has performed better with a 3.87% return vs -6.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BIL is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for RGTX.

BIL has the higher dividend yield at 3.86%, compared with 0.82% for RGTX.

RGTX is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while BIL is Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Defiance and State Street. Their fees differ too: 1.29% for RGTX and 0.14% for BIL.

BIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (19.71 vs -0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RGTX and BIL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer