RGTU vs. WTIU

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

RGTU (Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF) and WTIU (MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN) are both Leveraged Equities funds. RGTU is actively managed, while WTIU is passively managed. Over the past year, RGTU returned -24.32% vs 45.61% for WTIU. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RGTU charges 1.30%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for WTIU.

Performance

RGTU vs. WTIU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF (RGTU) and MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN (WTIU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RGTU achieves a -61.02% return, which is significantly lower than WTIU's 43.70% return.

RGTU

• 1D: -11.74%
• 1M: -51.89%
• YTD: -61.02%
• 6M: -68.54%
• 1Y: -24.32%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

WTIU

• 1D: 2.10%
• 1M: -18.32%
• YTD: 43.70%
• 6M: 46.65%
• 1Y: 45.61%
• 3Y*: -1.81%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RGTU vs. WTIU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
RGTU Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF	-61.02%	90.43%
WTIU MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN	43.70%	-4.98%

Correlation

The correlation between RGTU and WTIU is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.02
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2025	0.02

Return for Risk

RGTU vs. WTIU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RGTU

RGTU Risk / Return Rank: 16
RGTU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
RGTU Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
RGTU Omega Ratio Rank: 25
RGTU Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
RGTU Martin Ratio Rank: 8

WTIU

WTIU Risk / Return Rank: 22
WTIU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
WTIU Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
WTIU Omega Ratio Rank: 23
WTIU Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
WTIU Martin Ratio Rank: 22

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RGTU vs. WTIU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF (RGTU) and MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN (WTIU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RGTU	WTIU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.11	0.67	-0.78
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.54	1.25	+0.28
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.15	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.25	0.97	-1.23
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.33	2.51	-2.84

RGTU vs. WTIU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RGTU Sharpe Ratio is -0.11, which is lower than the WTIU Sharpe Ratio of 0.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RGTU and WTIU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RGTU vs. WTIU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RGTU drawdown since its inception was -96.96%, which is greater than WTIU's maximum drawdown of -75.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RGTU and WTIU.

Drawdown Indicators

	RGTU	WTIU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-96.96%	-75.73%	-21.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-96.96%	-47.07%	-49.89%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-75.73%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-95.64%	-49.06%	-46.58%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-63.86%	-39.21%	-24.65%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	73.82%	18.25%	+55.57%

Volatility

RGTU vs. WTIU - Volatility Comparison

Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF (RGTU) has a higher volatility of 64.59% compared to MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN (WTIU) at 22.57%. This indicates that RGTU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WTIU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RGTU	WTIU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	64.59%	22.57%	+42.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	140.29%	56.28%	+84.01%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	219.46%	68.30%	+151.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	219.07%	70.77%	+148.30%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	219.07%	70.77%	+148.30%

RGTU vs. WTIU - Expense Ratio Comparison

RGTU has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than WTIU's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

RGTU vs. WTIU - Dividend Comparison

RGTU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 52.92%, while WTIU has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
RGTU Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF	52.92%	20.63%
WTIU MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RGTU and WTIU in my portfolio?

RGTU and WTIU have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RGTU or WTIU?

RGTU has higher volatility (64.59%) compared to WTIU (22.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RGTU dropped -96.96% vs WTIU's -75.73%.

Which ETF is better, RGTU or WTIU?

On 1-year performance, WTIU leads with 45.61% vs -24.32% for RGTU. On fees, WTIU is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, WTIU has been the lower-risk option at 22.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RGTU or WTIU?

Over the 1-year period, WTIU has performed better with a 45.61% return vs -24.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RGTU or WTIU?

WTIU is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for RGTU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RGTU or WTIU?

RGTU has the higher dividend yield at 52.92%, compared with 0.00% for WTIU.

What is the main difference between RGTU and WTIU?

They also come from different issuers: Tradr and REX. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for RGTU and 0.95% for WTIU.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

WTIU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.67 vs -0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.