RGTU vs. WTIU
RGTU (Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF) and WTIU (MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN) are both Leveraged Equities funds. RGTU is actively managed, while WTIU is passively managed. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RGTU charges 1.30%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for WTIU.
Performance
RGTU vs. WTIU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RGTU achieves a -27.08% return, which is significantly lower than WTIU's 87.83% return.
RGTU
- 1D
- -0.51%
- 1M
- 46.09%
- YTD
- -27.08%
- 6M
- -62.95%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WTIU
- 1D
- -1.95%
- 1M
- -8.81%
- YTD
- 87.83%
- 6M
- 63.25%
- 1Y
- 112.38%
- 3Y*
- 5.95%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RGTU vs. WTIU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
RGTU Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF | -27.08% | 80.81% |
WTIU MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN | 87.83% | -0.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between RGTU and WTIU is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2025 | 0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RGTU vs. WTIU — Risk / Return Rank
RGTU
WTIU
RGTU vs. WTIU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF (RGTU) and MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN (WTIU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RGTU | WTIU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.68 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.16 | -0.10 | +0.26 |
Drawdowns
RGTU vs. WTIU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RGTU drawdown since its inception was -96.96%, which is greater than WTIU's maximum drawdown of -75.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RGTU and WTIU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RGTU | WTIU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.96% | -75.73% | -21.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -39.11% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -75.73% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -91.85% | -33.42% | -58.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -62.33% | -39.18% | -23.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 15.92% | — |
Volatility
RGTU vs. WTIU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RGTU | WTIU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 27.11% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 54.96% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 219.22% | 67.43% | +151.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 219.22% | 70.58% | +148.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 219.22% | 70.58% | +148.64% |
RGTU vs. WTIU - Expense Ratio Comparison
RGTU has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than WTIU's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
RGTU vs. WTIU - Dividend Comparison
RGTU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 28.29%, while WTIU has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
RGTU Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF | 28.29% | 20.63% |
WTIU MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RGTU and WTIU have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, WTIU is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
WTIU is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for RGTU.
RGTU has the higher dividend yield at 28.29%, compared with 0.00% for WTIU.
They also come from different issuers: Tradr and REX. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for RGTU and 0.95% for WTIU.
Find the right allocation for RGTU and WTIU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer