RGTU vs. NRGU

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

RGTU (Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF) and NRGU (MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN) are both Leveraged Equities funds. RGTU is actively managed, while NRGU is passively managed. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RGTU charges 1.30%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for NRGU.

Performance

RGTU vs. NRGU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF (RGTU) and MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RGTU achieves a -27.08% return, which is significantly lower than NRGU's 125.94% return.

RGTU

• 1D: -0.51%
• 1M: 46.09%
• YTD: -27.08%
• 6M: -62.95%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NRGU

• 1D: -1.47%
• 1M: -6.46%
• YTD: 125.94%
• 6M: 93.16%
• 1Y: 171.19%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RGTU vs. NRGU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
RGTU Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF	-27.08%	80.81%
NRGU MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN	125.94%	7.16%

Correlation

The correlation between RGTU and NRGU is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2025	0.04

Return for Risk

RGTU vs. NRGU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NRGU

NRGU Risk / Return Rank: 64
NRGU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
NRGU Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
NRGU Omega Ratio Rank: 53
NRGU Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
NRGU Martin Ratio Rank: 61

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RGTU vs. NRGU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF (RGTU) and MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RGTU	NRGU	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.31	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.16	0.43	-0.27

Drawdowns

RGTU vs. NRGU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RGTU drawdown since its inception was -96.96%, which is greater than NRGU's maximum drawdown of -57.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RGTU and NRGU.

Drawdown Indicators

	RGTU	NRGU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-96.96%	-57.50%	-39.46%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-39.95%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-91.85%	-22.07%	-69.78%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-62.33%	-25.41%	-36.92%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	16.01%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	RGTU	NRGU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	31.62%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	61.19%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	219.22%	75.02%	+144.20%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	219.22%	89.03%	+130.19%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	219.22%	89.03%	+130.19%

RGTU vs. NRGU - Expense Ratio Comparison

RGTU has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than NRGU's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

RGTU vs. NRGU - Dividend Comparison

RGTU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 28.29%, while NRGU has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
NRGU MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN	0.00%	0.00%
RGTU Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF	28.29%	20.63%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RGTU and NRGU in my portfolio?

RGTU and NRGU have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, RGTU or NRGU?

On fees, NRGU is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, RGTU or NRGU?

NRGU is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for RGTU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RGTU or NRGU?

RGTU has the higher dividend yield at 28.29%, compared with 0.00% for NRGU.

What is the main difference between RGTU and NRGU?

They also come from different issuers: Tradr and BMO. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for RGTU and 0.95% for NRGU.