RGTU vs. LINT

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

RGTU (Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF) and LINT (Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.38 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. RGTU charges 1.30%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for LINT.

Performance

RGTU vs. LINT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF (RGTU) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RGTU achieves a -76.61% return, which is significantly lower than LINT's 259.95% return.

RGTU

• 1D: 1.46%
• 1M: -36.13%
• 6M: -62.74%
• YTD: -76.61%
• 1Y: -68.03%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -52.05%

LINT

• 1D: -2.72%
• 1M: -47.53%
• 6M: 154.25%
• YTD: 259.95%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares	$19.47M	$20.67M	$35.74M
RGTU Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF	$1.69M	$1.58M	$6.01M

RGTU vs. LINT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
RGTU Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF	-76.61%	-34.90%
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares	259.95%	5.81%

Correlation

The correlation between RGTU and LINT is 0.38, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025	0.38

Return for Risk

RGTU vs. LINT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RGTU

RGTU Risk / Return Rank: 11
RGTU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
RGTU Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
RGTU Omega Ratio Rank: 19
RGTU Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
RGTU Martin Ratio Rank: 5

LINT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RGTU vs. LINT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF (RGTU) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RGTU	LINT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.33	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.73	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.08	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.71	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.88	—	—

Drawdowns

RGTU vs. LINT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RGTU drawdown since its inception was -97.93%, which is greater than LINT's maximum drawdown of -69.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RGTU and LINT.

Drawdown Indicators

	RGTU	LINT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-97.93%	-69.02%	-28.91%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-97.93%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-97.39%	-62.88%	-34.51%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-66.82%	-23.85%	-42.97%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	79.64%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	RGTU	LINT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	54.17%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	143.29%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	213.12%	169.51%	+43.61%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	215.68%	169.51%	+46.17%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	215.68%	169.51%	+46.17%

RGTU vs. LINT - Expense Ratio Comparison

RGTU has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than LINT's 0.97% expense ratio.

Dividends

RGTU vs. LINT - Dividend Comparison

RGTU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 88.22%, more than LINT's 0.76% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares	0.76%	0.25%
RGTU Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF	88.22%	20.63%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RGTU and LINT in my portfolio?

RGTU and LINT have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, RGTU or LINT?

On fees, LINT is cheaper at 0.97% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, RGTU or LINT?

LINT is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for RGTU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RGTU or LINT?

RGTU has the higher dividend yield at 88.22%, compared with 0.76% for LINT.

What is the main difference between RGTU and LINT?

They also come from different issuers: Tradr and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for RGTU and 0.97% for LINT.