RGTU vs. ISCMF
RGTU (Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF) and ISCMF (iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RGTU is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Tradr, while ISCMF is a Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity Index. RGTU is actively managed, while ISCMF is passively managed. Over the past year, RGTU returned 0.54% vs 31.30% for ISCMF. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions. RGTU charges 1.30%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for ISCMF.
Performance
RGTU vs. ISCMF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RGTU achieves a -47.21% return, which is significantly lower than ISCMF's 22.87% return.
RGTU
- 1D
- -1.12%
- 1M
- -43.27%
- YTD
- -47.21%
- 6M
- -59.39%
- 1Y
- 0.54%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ISCMF
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -4.99%
- YTD
- 22.87%
- 6M
- 22.87%
- 1Y
- 31.30%
- 3Y*
- 16.78%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RGTU vs. ISCMF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
RGTU Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF | -47.21% | 90.43% |
ISCMF iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF | 22.87% | 6.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between RGTU and ISCMF is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2025 | -0.05 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RGTU vs. ISCMF — Risk / Return Rank
RGTU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ISCMF
RGTU vs. ISCMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF (RGTU) and iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ISCMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RGTU | ISCMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 2.31 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 5.53 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 11.85 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RGTU vs. ISCMF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RGTU drawdown since its inception was -96.96%, which is greater than ISCMF's maximum drawdown of -25.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RGTU and ISCMF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RGTU | ISCMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.96% | -25.42% | -71.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -96.96% | -5.69% | -91.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -7.62% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -94.10% | -5.26% | -88.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -63.61% | -13.35% | -50.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.65% | — |
Volatility
RGTU vs. ISCMF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RGTU | ISCMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.11% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 15.45% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 218.91% | 17.84% | +201.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 218.91% | 14.29% | +204.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 218.91% | 14.29% | +204.62% |
RGTU vs. ISCMF - Expense Ratio Comparison
RGTU has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than ISCMF's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
RGTU vs. ISCMF - Dividend Comparison
RGTU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 39.08%, while ISCMF has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ISCMF iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RGTU Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF | 39.08% | 20.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RGTU and ISCMF have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On 1-year performance, ISCMF leads with 31.30% vs 0.54% for RGTU. On fees, ISCMF is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, ISCMF has performed better with a 31.30% return vs 0.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ISCMF is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for RGTU.
RGTU has the higher dividend yield at 39.08%, compared with 0.00% for ISCMF.
RGTU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while ISCMF is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Tradr and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for RGTU and 0.19% for ISCMF.
Find the right allocation for RGTU and ISCMF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer