RGTU vs. BIL

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

RGTU (Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF) and BIL (SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RGTU is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Tradr, while BIL is a Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg 1-3 Month U.S. Treasury Bill Index. RGTU is actively managed, while BIL is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.12, they often move in opposite directions. RGTU charges 1.30%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for BIL.

Performance

RGTU vs. BIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF (RGTU) and SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RGTU achieves a -27.08% return, which is significantly lower than BIL's 1.49% return.

RGTU

• 1D: -0.51%
• 1M: 46.09%
• YTD: -27.08%
• 6M: -62.95%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BIL

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.27%
• YTD: 1.49%
• 6M: 1.76%
• 1Y: 3.87%
• 3Y*: 4.64%
• 5Y*: 3.41%
• 10Y*: 2.18%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RGTU vs. BIL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
RGTU Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF	-27.08%	80.81%
BIL SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF	1.49%	2.13%

Correlation

The correlation between RGTU and BIL is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2025	-0.12

Return for Risk

RGTU vs. BIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BIL

BIL Risk / Return Rank: 100
BIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
BIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
BIL Omega Ratio Rank: 100
BIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
BIL Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RGTU vs. BIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF (RGTU) and SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RGTU	BIL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	19.71	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	13.15	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	8.51	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.16	2.78	-2.62

Drawdowns

RGTU vs. BIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RGTU drawdown since its inception was -96.96%, which is greater than BIL's maximum drawdown of -0.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RGTU and BIL.

Drawdown Indicators

	RGTU	BIL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-96.96%	-0.78%	-96.18%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-0.01%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-0.01%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-0.10%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-0.21%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-91.85%	0.00%	-91.85%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-62.33%	-0.26%	-62.07%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.00%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	RGTU	BIL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.06%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	0.13%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	219.22%	0.20%	+219.02%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	219.22%	0.26%	+218.96%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	219.22%	0.26%	+218.96%

RGTU vs. BIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

RGTU has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than BIL's 0.14% expense ratio.

Dividends

RGTU vs. BIL - Dividend Comparison

RGTU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 28.29%, more than BIL's 3.86% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
BIL SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF	3.86%	4.13%	5.03%	4.92%	1.35%	0.00%	0.30%	2.05%	1.66%	0.68%	0.07%
RGTU Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF	28.29%	20.63%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RGTU and BIL in my portfolio?

RGTU and BIL have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, RGTU or BIL?

On fees, BIL is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, RGTU or BIL?

BIL is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for RGTU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RGTU or BIL?

RGTU has the higher dividend yield at 28.29%, compared with 3.86% for BIL.

What is the main difference between RGTU and BIL?

RGTU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while BIL is Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Tradr and State Street. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for RGTU and 0.14% for BIL.