PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RGTI vs. CIFR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

RGTI vs. CIFR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rigetti Computing Inc (RGTI) and Cipher Mining Inc. (CIFR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RGTI achieves a -1.74% return, which is significantly lower than CIFR's 64.57% return.


RGTI

1D
5.25%
1M
14.92%
YTD
-1.74%
6M
-22.98%
1Y
92.95%
3Y*
153.88%
5Y*
17.30%
10Y*

CIFR

1D
8.20%
1M
18.20%
YTD
64.57%
6M
24.69%
1Y
522.82%
3Y*
119.40%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RGTI vs. CIFR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
RGTI
Rigetti Computing Inc
-1.74%45.15%1,449.40%35.07%-92.91%6.08%
CIFR
Cipher Mining Inc.
64.57%218.10%12.35%637.50%-87.90%-54.92%

Correlation

The correlation between RGTI and CIFR is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2021

0.35

The correlation between RGTI and CIFR shifts across timeframes, from 0.35 (all time) to 0.53 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

RGTI:

$7.30B

CIFR:

$9.84B

EPS

RGTI:

-$0.71

CIFR:

-$2.33

PS Ratio

RGTI:

689.11

CIFR:

53.38

PB Ratio

RGTI:

12.51

CIFR:

13.78

Total Revenue (TTM)

RGTI:

$10.02M

CIFR:

$174.98M

Gross Profit (TTM)

RGTI:

$3.00M

CIFR:

-$172.84M

EBITDA (TTM)

RGTI:

-$263.06M

CIFR:

-$169.22M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RGTI vs. CIFR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RGTI
RGTI Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
RGTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RGTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
RGTI Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
RGTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
RGTI Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

CIFR
CIFR Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
CIFR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CIFR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
CIFR Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
CIFR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
CIFR Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RGTI vs. CIFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rigetti Computing Inc (RGTI) and Cipher Mining Inc. (CIFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RGTICIFRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-4.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.87

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.45

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.21

10.27

-9.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.89

20.60

-18.71

RGTI vs. CIFR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RGTI Sharpe Ratio is 0.86, which is lower than the CIFR Sharpe Ratio of 4.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RGTI and CIFR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RGTICIFRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

4.86

-4.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.13

0.16

-0.03

Drawdowns

RGTI vs. CIFR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RGTI drawdown since its inception was -96.89%, roughly equal to the maximum CIFR drawdown of -97.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RGTI and CIFR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RGTICIFRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.89%

-97.16%

+0.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-77.10%

-51.38%

-25.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-78.83%

-71.74%

-7.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-96.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-61.37%

-7.61%

-53.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-58.86%

-66.47%

+7.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

49.35%

25.55%

+23.80%

Volatility

RGTI vs. CIFR - Volatility Comparison

Rigetti Computing Inc (RGTI) has a higher volatility of 44.71% compared to Cipher Mining Inc. (CIFR) at 27.70%. This indicates that RGTI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CIFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RGTICIFRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

44.71%

27.70%

+17.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

70.87%

70.95%

-0.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

109.36%

108.62%

+0.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

128.92%

122.03%

+6.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

127.31%

122.03%

+5.28%

Dividends

RGTI vs. CIFR - Dividend Comparison

Neither RGTI nor CIFR has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

RGTI vs. CIFR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Rigetti Computing Inc and Cipher Mining Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00M40.00M60.00M80.00M20222023202420252026
4.40M
0
(RGTI) Total Revenue
(CIFR) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


RGTI and CIFR have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RGTI has higher volatility (44.71%) compared to CIFR (27.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RGTI dropped -96.89% vs CIFR's -97.16%.

CIFR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.86 vs 0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RGTI and CIFR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer