PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RGTI vs. BABA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

RGTI vs. BABA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rigetti Computing Inc (RGTI) and Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RGTI achieves a -5.28% return, which is significantly higher than BABA's -22.32% return.


RGTI

1D
1.70%
1M
8.87%
YTD
-5.28%
6M
-18.81%
1Y
84.04%
3Y*
152.06%
5Y*
16.53%
10Y*

BABA

1D
0.12%
1M
-19.32%
YTD
-22.32%
6M
-26.87%
1Y
0.87%
3Y*
11.06%
5Y*
-10.74%
10Y*
4.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RGTI vs. BABA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
RGTI
Rigetti Computing Inc
-5.28%45.15%1,449.40%35.07%-92.91%3.94%
BABA
Alibaba Group Holding Limited
-22.32%75.80%11.77%-10.83%-25.84%-48.23%

Correlation

The correlation between RGTI and BABA is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 22, 2021

0.21

Fundamentals

Market Cap

RGTI:

$7.04B

BABA:

$272.45B

EPS

RGTI:

-$0.71

BABA:

CN¥33.90

PS Ratio

RGTI:

664.25

BABA:

2.26

PB Ratio

RGTI:

12.06

BABA:

1.75

Total Revenue (TTM)

RGTI:

$10.02M

BABA:

CN¥811.51B

Gross Profit (TTM)

RGTI:

$3.00M

BABA:

CN¥332.88B

EBITDA (TTM)

RGTI:

-$263.06M

BABA:

CN¥112.44B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RGTI vs. BABA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RGTI
RGTI Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
RGTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RGTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
RGTI Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
RGTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
RGTI Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

BABA
BABA Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
BABA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BABA Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
BABA Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
BABA Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
BABA Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RGTI vs. BABA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rigetti Computing Inc (RGTI) and Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RGTIBABADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.03

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.96

-0.06

+1.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.47

-0.12

+1.59

RGTI vs. BABA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RGTI Sharpe Ratio is 0.68, which is higher than the BABA Sharpe Ratio of -0.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RGTI and BABA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RGTI vs. BABA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RGTI drawdown since its inception was -96.89%, which is greater than BABA's maximum drawdown of -80.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RGTI and BABA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RGTIBABADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.89%

-80.09%

-16.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-77.10%

-39.94%

-37.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-78.83%

-39.94%

-38.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-96.89%

-72.48%

-24.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-80.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-62.76%

-62.20%

-0.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-58.84%

-37.56%

-21.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

49.98%

19.58%

+30.40%

Volatility

RGTI vs. BABA - Volatility Comparison

Rigetti Computing Inc (RGTI) has a higher volatility of 44.79% compared to Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) at 10.07%. This indicates that RGTI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BABA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RGTIBABADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

44.79%

10.07%

+34.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

71.15%

29.24%

+41.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

109.21%

43.83%

+65.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

128.97%

51.40%

+77.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

127.17%

43.40%

+83.77%

Dividends

RGTI vs. BABA - Dividend Comparison

RGTI has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BABA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%.


PositionTTM202520242023
BABA
Alibaba Group Holding Limited
0.93%1.36%1.96%1.29%
RGTI
Rigetti Computing Inc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

RGTI vs. BABA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Rigetti Computing Inc and Alibaba Group Holding Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00B100.00B150.00B200.00B250.00B300.00B20222023202420252026
4.40M
35.15B
(RGTI) Total Revenue
(BABA) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. RGTI values in USD, BABA values in CNY

Frequently Asked Questions


RGTI and BABA have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RGTI has higher volatility (44.79%) compared to BABA (10.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RGTI dropped -96.89% vs BABA's -80.09%.

RGTI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.68 vs -0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RGTI and BABA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer