RGR vs. CTAS
RGR (Sturm, Ruger & Company, Inc.) and CTAS (Cintas Corporation) are both stocks. Both are in the Industrials sector — RGR in Aerospace & Defense, CTAS in Specialty Business Services. Over the past 10 years, RGR returned -0.07%/yr vs 23.37%/yr for CTAS. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
RGR vs. CTAS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RGR achieves a 18.37% return, which is significantly higher than CTAS's -7.21% return. Over the past 10 years, RGR has underperformed CTAS with an annualized return of -0.07%, while CTAS has yielded a comparatively higher 23.37% annualized return.
RGR
- 1D
- -0.80%
- 1M
- -1.21%
- YTD
- 18.37%
- 6M
- 18.77%
- 1Y
- 8.20%
- 3Y*
- -8.15%
- 5Y*
- -9.67%
- 10Y*
- -0.07%
CTAS
- 1D
- -3.45%
- 1M
- 4.28%
- YTD
- -7.21%
- 6M
- -4.62%
- 1Y
- -23.00%
- 3Y*
- 14.08%
- 5Y*
- 15.90%
- 10Y*
- 23.37%
RGR vs. CTAS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RGR Sturm, Ruger & Company, Inc. | 18.37% | -6.13% | -20.91% | -8.04% | -15.41% | 9.30% | 50.28% | -10.14% | -2.84% | 8.65% |
CTAS Cintas Corporation | -7.21% | 3.78% | 22.24% | 34.82% | 2.97% | 26.51% | 32.74% | 61.73% | 9.04% | 36.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between RGR and CTAS is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 17, 1993 | 0.24 |
Fundamentals
RGR:
$624.87M
CTAS:
$70.65B
RGR:
-$0.73
CTAS:
$4.75
RGR:
1.14
CTAS:
6.42
RGR:
2.21
CTAS:
14.75
RGR:
$551.68M
CTAS:
$11.03B
RGR:
$79.33M
CTAS:
$1.33B
RGR:
-$2.50M
CTAS:
$2.66B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RGR vs. CTAS — Risk / Return Rank
RGR
CTAS
RGR vs. CTAS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sturm, Ruger & Company, Inc. (RGR) and Cintas Corporation (CTAS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RGR | CTAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 0.82 | +0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.21 | -0.85 | +1.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.47 | -1.49 | +1.96 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RGR | CTAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 | -1.16 | +1.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.32 | 0.71 | -1.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.00 | 0.88 | -0.88 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.21 | 0.52 | -0.31 |
Drawdowns
RGR vs. CTAS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RGR drawdown since its inception was -79.69%, which is greater than CTAS's maximum drawdown of -65.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RGR and CTAS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RGR | CTAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.69% | -65.32% | -14.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -38.79% | -27.23% | -11.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -46.00% | -27.68% | -18.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -60.59% | -27.68% | -32.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -60.59% | -48.38% | -12.21% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -47.12% | -23.00% | -24.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.96% | -15.04% | -16.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.56% | 15.88% | +1.68% |
Volatility
RGR vs. CTAS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Sturm, Ruger & Company, Inc. (RGR) is 7.14%, while Cintas Corporation (CTAS) has a volatility of 7.66%. This indicates that RGR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CTAS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RGR | CTAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.14% | 7.66% | -0.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.49% | 15.25% | +4.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.49% | 19.92% | +15.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.36% | 22.51% | +7.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.10% | 26.67% | +6.43% |
Dividends
RGR vs. CTAS - Dividend Comparison
RGR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, less than CTAS's 1.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CTAS Cintas Corporation | 1.04% | 0.89% | 0.80% | 0.83% | 0.93% | 0.77% | 0.99% | 0.95% | 1.22% | 1.04% | 1.15% | 1.15% |
RGR Sturm, Ruger & Company, Inc. | 1.01% | 1.90% | 1.95% | 2.79% | 14.66% | 4.94% | 10.00% | 1.74% | 2.07% | 2.44% | 3.28% | 1.85% |
Financials
RGR vs. CTAS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Sturm, Ruger & Company, Inc. and Cintas Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
RGR vs. CTAS - Profitability Comparison
RGR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sturm, Ruger & Company, Inc. reported a gross profit of 28.08M and revenue of 141.36M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 19.9%.
CTAS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cintas Corporation reported a gross profit of -2.78B and revenue of 2.84B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -97.8%.
RGR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sturm, Ruger & Company, Inc. reported an operating income of -1.95M and revenue of 141.36M, resulting in an operating margin of -1.4%.
CTAS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cintas Corporation reported an operating income of 659.90M and revenue of 2.84B, resulting in an operating margin of 23.2%.
RGR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sturm, Ruger & Company, Inc. reported a net income of 128.00K and revenue of 141.36M, resulting in a net margin of 0.1%.
CTAS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cintas Corporation reported a net income of 502.50M and revenue of 2.84B, resulting in a net margin of 17.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
RGR and CTAS have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CTAS has higher volatility (7.66%) compared to RGR (7.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RGR dropped -79.69% vs CTAS's -65.32%.
RGR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.23 vs -1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RGR and CTAS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer