RGP vs. DIN

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Resources Connection, Inc. (RGP) and Dine Brands Global, Inc. (DIN).

Performance

RGP vs. DIN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Resources Connection, Inc. (RGP) and Dine Brands Global, Inc. (DIN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

RGP vs. DIN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RGP Resources Connection, Inc.	-24.64%	-37.28%	-36.50%	-20.09%	6.25%	47.30%	-19.45%	18.95%	-5.11%	-17.11%
DIN Dine Brands Global, Inc.	-17.81%	14.14%	-35.73%	-20.32%	-12.36%	31.43%	-27.31%	28.20%	37.27%	-28.45%

Fundamentals

Market Cap RGP : $123.73M DIN : $348.99M
EPS RGP : -$4.01 DIN : $1.13
PS Ratio RGP : 0.24 DIN : 0.42
Total Revenue (TTM) RGP : $506.74M DIN : $879.30M
Gross Profit (TTM) RGP : $192.53M DIN : $359.30M
EBITDA (TTM) RGP : -$8.62M DIN : $126.72M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RGP achieves a -24.64% return, which is significantly lower than DIN's -17.81% return. Over the past 10 years, RGP has underperformed DIN with an annualized return of -9.69%, while DIN has yielded a comparatively higher -8.06% annualized return.

RGP

• 1D: 0.54%
• 1M: -0.80%
• YTD: -24.64%
• 6M: -23.64%
• 1Y: -39.41%
• 3Y*: -36.47%
• 5Y*: -19.45%
• 10Y*: -9.69%

DIN

• 1D: 0.92%
• 1M: -14.68%
• YTD: -17.81%
• 6M: 7.46%
• 1Y: 18.86%
• 3Y*: -23.07%
• 5Y*: -18.88%
• 10Y*: -8.06%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

RGP vs. DIN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RGP

RGP Risk / Return Rank: 10
RGP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
RGP Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
RGP Omega Ratio Rank: 12
RGP Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
RGP Martin Ratio Rank: 10

DIN

DIN Risk / Return Rank: 54
DIN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
DIN Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
DIN Omega Ratio Rank: 50
DIN Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
DIN Martin Ratio Rank: 56

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RGP vs. DIN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Resources Connection, Inc. (RGP) and Dine Brands Global, Inc. (DIN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RGP	DIN	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.77	0.40	-1.17
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.95	0.93	-1.88
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.88	1.10	-0.22
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.89	0.51	-1.41
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.50	1.34	-2.83
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RGP vs. DIN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RGP Sharpe Ratio is -0.77, which is lower than the DIN Sharpe Ratio of 0.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RGP and DIN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RGP	DIN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.77	0.40	-1.17
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.51	-0.44	-0.08
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.26	-0.15	-0.11
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.18	0.14	-0.32

Correlation

The correlation between RGP and DIN is 0.37, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

RGP vs. DIN - Dividend Comparison

RGP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.51%, more than DIN's 5.34% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RGP Resources Connection, Inc.	7.51%	6.94%	6.57%	3.95%	3.05%	3.14%	4.46%	3.31%	3.52%	2.98%	2.18%	2.20%
DIN Dine Brands Global, Inc.	5.34%	5.35%	6.78%	4.11%	3.08%	0.53%	1.31%	3.30%	3.74%	7.65%	4.84%	4.19%

Drawdowns

RGP vs. DIN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RGP drawdown since its inception was -82.94%, smaller than the maximum DIN drawdown of -91.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RGP and DIN.

Drawdown Indicators

	RGP	DIN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-82.94%	-91.50%	+8.56%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-44.25%	-34.69%	-9.56%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-80.98%	-78.02%	-2.96%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-80.98%	-83.26%	+2.28%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-81.77%	-67.62%	-14.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-46.57%	-24.14%	-22.43%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	26.45%	13.29%	+13.16%

Volatility

RGP vs. DIN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Resources Connection, Inc. (RGP) is 7.73%, while Dine Brands Global, Inc. (DIN) has a volatility of 13.04%. This indicates that RGP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DIN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RGP	DIN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.73%	13.04%	-5.31%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	33.13%	32.04%	+1.09%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	51.03%	47.92%	+3.11%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	38.21%	43.53%	-5.32%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	37.51%	54.42%	-16.91%

Financials

RGP vs. DIN - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Resources Connection, Inc. and Dine Brands Global, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

RGP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Resources Connection, Inc. reported a gross profit of 45.25M and revenue of 117.73M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 38.4%.

DIN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Dine Brands Global, Inc. reported a gross profit of 94.62M and revenue of 217.57M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 43.5%.

RGP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Resources Connection, Inc. reported an operating income of -12.47M and revenue of 117.73M, resulting in an operating margin of -10.6%.

DIN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Dine Brands Global, Inc. reported an operating income of 49.03M and revenue of 217.57M, resulting in an operating margin of 22.5%.

RGP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Resources Connection, Inc. reported a net income of -12.66M and revenue of 117.73M, resulting in a net margin of -10.8%.

DIN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Dine Brands Global, Inc. reported a net income of -13.34M and revenue of 217.57M, resulting in a net margin of -6.1%.