PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RGLD vs. TFPM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

RGLD vs. TFPM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Royal Gold, Inc. (RGLD) and Triple Flag Precious Metals Corp (TFPM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RGLD achieves a -6.25% return, which is significantly higher than TFPM's -11.94% return.


RGLD

1D
1.47%
1M
-15.27%
YTD
-6.25%
6M
-4.74%
1Y
16.96%
3Y*
21.73%
5Y*
12.37%
10Y*
13.61%

TFPM

1D
4.14%
1M
-17.89%
YTD
-11.94%
6M
-15.62%
1Y
19.91%
3Y*
28.25%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RGLD vs. TFPM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
RGLD
Royal Gold, Inc.
-6.25%70.43%10.39%8.70%8.51%8.95%
TFPM
Triple Flag Precious Metals Corp
-11.94%123.03%14.60%-1.81%14.71%32.61%

Correlation

The correlation between RGLD and TFPM is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2021

0.57

Over the past year, RGLD and TFPM have become more correlated (0.81) than their long-term average of 0.57, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

RGLD:

$17.65B

TFPM:

$6.04B

EPS

RGLD:

$8.53

TFPM:

$1.51

PE Ratio

RGLD:

24.34

TFPM:

19.28

PEG Ratio

RGLD:

1.66

TFPM:

0.15

PS Ratio

RGLD:

11.81

TFPM:

13.23

PB Ratio

RGLD:

2.38

TFPM:

2.80

Total Revenue (TTM)

RGLD:

$1.31B

TFPM:

$453.24M

Gross Profit (TTM)

RGLD:

$579.68M

TFPM:

$337.23M

EBITDA (TTM)

RGLD:

$949.59M

TFPM:

$354.95M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RGLD vs. TFPM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RGLD
RGLD Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
RGLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RGLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
RGLD Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
RGLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
RGLD Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

TFPM
TFPM Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
TFPM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TFPM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
TFPM Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
TFPM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
TFPM Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RGLD vs. TFPM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Royal Gold, Inc. (RGLD) and Triple Flag Precious Metals Corp (TFPM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RGLDTFPMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.11

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.48

0.57

-0.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.27

1.64

-0.36

RGLD vs. TFPM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RGLD Sharpe Ratio is 0.43, which is comparable to the TFPM Sharpe Ratio of 0.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RGLD and TFPM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RGLD vs. TFPM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RGLD drawdown since its inception was -98.29%, which is greater than TFPM's maximum drawdown of -36.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RGLD and TFPM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RGLDTFPMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.29%

-36.48%

-61.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-35.12%

-34.87%

-0.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.12%

-34.87%

-0.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-31.66%

-29.27%

-2.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.82%

-13.43%

-16.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.34%

12.18%

+1.16%

Volatility

RGLD vs. TFPM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Royal Gold, Inc. (RGLD) is 12.33%, while Triple Flag Precious Metals Corp (TFPM) has a volatility of 15.92%. This indicates that RGLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TFPM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RGLDTFPMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.33%

15.92%

-3.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

32.22%

34.29%

-2.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.34%

43.51%

-4.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.58%

37.45%

-5.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.66%

37.45%

-3.79%

Dividends

RGLD vs. TFPM - Dividend Comparison

RGLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%, more than TFPM's 0.79% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RGLD
Royal Gold, Inc.
0.89%0.81%1.21%1.24%1.24%1.14%1.05%0.87%1.17%1.17%1.45%1.81%
TFPM
Triple Flag Precious Metals Corp
0.79%0.68%1.43%1.54%1.07%0.39%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

RGLD vs. TFPM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Royal Gold, Inc. and Triple Flag Precious Metals Corp. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M500.00M20222023202420252026
469.13M
144.96M
(RGLD) Total Revenue
(TFPM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

RGLD vs. TFPM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Royal Gold, Inc. and Triple Flag Precious Metals Corp over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%202220232024202520260
72.0%
Portfolio components
RGLD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Royal Gold, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 469.13M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

TFPM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Triple Flag Precious Metals Corp reported a gross profit of 104.35M and revenue of 144.96M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 72.0%.

RGLD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Royal Gold, Inc. reported an operating income of 297.09M and revenue of 469.13M, resulting in an operating margin of 63.3%.

TFPM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Triple Flag Precious Metals Corp reported an operating income of 97.00M and revenue of 144.96M, resulting in an operating margin of 66.9%.

RGLD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Royal Gold, Inc. reported a net income of 281.13M and revenue of 469.13M, resulting in a net margin of 59.9%.

TFPM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Triple Flag Precious Metals Corp reported a net income of 115.31M and revenue of 144.96M, resulting in a net margin of 79.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


RGLD and TFPM have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TFPM has higher volatility (15.92%) compared to RGLD (12.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RGLD dropped -98.29% vs TFPM's -36.48%.

TFPM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.46 vs 0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RGLD and TFPM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer