TFPM vs. GLDM
TFPM (Triple Flag Precious Metals Corp) is a stock, while GLDM (SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust) is Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM. Over the past 3 years, TFPM returned 29.62%/yr vs 31.49%/yr for GLDM. At a 0.50 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
TFPM vs. GLDM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TFPM achieves a -9.80% return, which is significantly lower than GLDM's 3.00% return.
TFPM
- 1D
- -3.43%
- 1M
- -4.52%
- YTD
- -9.80%
- 6M
- -7.74%
- 1Y
- 25.91%
- 3Y*
- 29.62%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GLDM
- 1D
- -0.96%
- 1M
- -1.62%
- YTD
- 3.00%
- 6M
- 5.60%
- 1Y
- 32.42%
- 3Y*
- 31.49%
- 5Y*
- 18.49%
- 10Y*
- —
TFPM vs. GLDM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TFPM Triple Flag Precious Metals Corp | -9.80% | 123.03% | 14.60% | -1.81% | 14.71% | 33.50% |
GLDM SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust | 3.00% | 64.20% | 27.08% | 13.04% | -0.47% | 4.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between TFPM and GLDM is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2021 | 0.50 |
The correlation between TFPM and GLDM shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (all time) to 0.68 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TFPM vs. GLDM — Risk / Return Rank
TFPM
GLDM
TFPM vs. GLDM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Triple Flag Precious Metals Corp (TFPM) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TFPM | GLDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.61 | 1.24 | -0.62 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.03 | 1.63 | -0.61 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.25 | -0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.94 | 1.70 | -0.76 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.36 | 4.23 | -1.87 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TFPM | GLDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 | 1.24 | -0.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.04 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.82 | 1.02 | -0.19 |
Drawdowns
TFPM vs. GLDM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TFPM drawdown since its inception was -36.48%, which is greater than GLDM's maximum drawdown of -21.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TFPM and GLDM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TFPM | GLDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.48% | -21.63% | -14.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.55% | -19.14% | -8.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.55% | -19.14% | -8.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -20.92% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -27.55% | -17.65% | -9.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.32% | -6.22% | -7.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.02% | 7.69% | +3.33% |
Volatility
TFPM vs. GLDM - Volatility Comparison
Triple Flag Precious Metals Corp (TFPM) has a higher volatility of 15.34% compared to SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM) at 5.47%. This indicates that TFPM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLDM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TFPM | GLDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.34% | 5.47% | +9.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.07% | 22.99% | +10.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 42.69% | 26.39% | +16.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.27% | 17.91% | +19.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.27% | 16.85% | +20.42% |
Dividends
TFPM vs. GLDM - Dividend Comparison
TFPM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.77%, while GLDM has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLDM SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TFPM Triple Flag Precious Metals Corp | 0.77% | 0.68% | 1.43% | 1.54% | 1.07% | 0.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TFPM and GLDM have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TFPM has higher volatility (15.34%) compared to GLDM (5.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TFPM dropped -36.48% vs GLDM's -21.63%.
GLDM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.24 vs 0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TFPM and GLDM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer