RGLD vs. FTEC

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

RGLD (Royal Gold, Inc.) is a stock, while FTEC (Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF) is Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. Over the past 10 years, RGLD returned 14.72%/yr vs 25.40%/yr for FTEC. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

RGLD vs. FTEC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Royal Gold, Inc. (RGLD) and Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RGLD achieves a -0.56% return, which is significantly lower than FTEC's 30.73% return. Over the past 10 years, RGLD has underperformed FTEC with an annualized return of 14.72%, while FTEC has yielded a comparatively higher 25.40% annualized return.

RGLD

• 1D: 1.56%
• 1M: -2.54%
• YTD: -0.56%
• 6M: 8.83%
• 1Y: 20.74%
• 3Y*: 23.12%
• 5Y*: 13.84%
• 10Y*: 14.72%

FTEC

• 1D: -0.88%
• 1M: 15.13%
• YTD: 30.73%
• 6M: 28.96%
• 1Y: 59.04%
• 3Y*: 33.80%
• 5Y*: 22.27%
• 10Y*: 25.40%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RGLD vs. FTEC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RGLD Royal Gold, Inc.	-0.56%	70.43%	10.39%	8.70%	8.51%	0.04%	-12.13%	44.27%	5.53%	31.32%
FTEC Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF	30.73%	22.11%	29.40%	53.30%	-29.59%	30.49%	45.83%	48.93%	-0.39%	36.83%

Correlation

The correlation between RGLD and FTEC is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.25
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.21
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.20
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.17
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2013	0.16

Return for Risk

RGLD vs. FTEC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RGLD

RGLD Risk / Return Rank: 56
RGLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
RGLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
RGLD Omega Ratio Rank: 53
RGLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
RGLD Martin Ratio Rank: 59

FTEC

FTEC Risk / Return Rank: 77
FTEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
FTEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
FTEC Omega Ratio Rank: 79
FTEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
FTEC Martin Ratio Rank: 65

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RGLD vs. FTEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Royal Gold, Inc. (RGLD) and Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RGLD	FTEC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.54	2.88	-2.34
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.94	3.56	-2.63
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.12	1.46	-0.34
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.71	3.65	-2.94
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.67	11.73	-10.06
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RGLD vs. FTEC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RGLD Sharpe Ratio is 0.54, which is lower than the FTEC Sharpe Ratio of 2.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RGLD and FTEC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RGLD	FTEC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.54	2.88	-2.34
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.44	0.89	-0.44
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.44	1.03	-0.59
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.18	0.98	-0.80

Drawdowns

RGLD vs. FTEC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RGLD drawdown since its inception was -98.29%, which is greater than FTEC's maximum drawdown of -34.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RGLD and FTEC.

Drawdown Indicators

	RGLD	FTEC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-98.29%	-34.95%	-63.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-29.27%	-16.26%	-13.01%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.27%	-27.30%	-1.97%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-40.73%	-34.95%	-5.78%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-49.55%	-34.95%	-14.60%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-27.51%	-2.36%	-25.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-29.82%	-5.56%	-24.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.42%	5.05%	+7.37%

Volatility

RGLD vs. FTEC - Volatility Comparison

Royal Gold, Inc. (RGLD) has a higher volatility of 11.32% compared to Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC) at 6.56%. This indicates that RGLD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTEC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RGLD	FTEC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.32%	6.56%	+4.76%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	31.34%	16.16%	+15.18%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	38.71%	20.61%	+18.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	31.41%	25.22%	+6.19%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.59%	24.69%	+8.90%

Dividends

RGLD vs. FTEC - Dividend Comparison

RGLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.84%, more than FTEC's 0.32% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FTEC Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF	0.32%	0.43%	0.49%	0.77%	0.93%	0.63%	0.83%	1.03%	1.20%	0.96%	1.25%	1.27%
RGLD Royal Gold, Inc.	0.84%	0.81%	1.21%	1.24%	1.24%	1.14%	1.05%	0.87%	1.17%	1.17%	1.45%	1.81%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RGLD and FTEC in my portfolio?

RGLD and FTEC have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RGLD or FTEC?

RGLD has higher volatility (11.32%) compared to FTEC (6.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RGLD dropped -98.29% vs FTEC's -34.95%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FTEC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.88 vs 0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.