PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RGAGX vs. MVCAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RGAGX vs. MVCAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class R-6 (RGAGX) and MFS Mid Cap Value Fund (MVCAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RGAGX achieves a 9.36% return, which is significantly higher than MVCAX's 8.61% return. Over the past 10 years, RGAGX has outperformed MVCAX with an annualized return of 16.30%, while MVCAX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.73% annualized return.


RGAGX

1D
-0.80%
1M
5.24%
YTD
9.36%
6M
8.89%
1Y
25.11%
3Y*
25.20%
5Y*
12.43%
10Y*
16.30%

MVCAX

1D
-0.21%
1M
1.97%
YTD
8.61%
6M
8.61%
1Y
17.49%
3Y*
13.44%
5Y*
7.50%
10Y*
9.73%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RGAGX vs. MVCAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RGAGX
American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class R-6
9.36%20.08%28.41%37.66%-30.53%19.67%38.30%29.22%-2.88%26.53%
MVCAX
MFS Mid Cap Value Fund
8.61%6.09%13.57%12.51%-8.96%30.43%4.03%30.57%-11.69%13.37%

Correlation

The correlation between RGAGX and MVCAX is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2009

0.81

Over the past year, the correlation between RGAGX and MVCAX has dropped to 0.57 - well below their long-term average of 0.81, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RGAGX vs. MVCAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RGAGX
RGAGX Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
RGAGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RGAGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
RGAGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
RGAGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
RGAGX Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

MVCAX
MVCAX Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
MVCAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MVCAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
MVCAX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
MVCAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
MVCAX Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RGAGX vs. MVCAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class R-6 (RGAGX) and MFS Mid Cap Value Fund (MVCAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RGAGXMVCAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.23

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.87

1.82

+0.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.32

6.20

+1.12

RGAGX vs. MVCAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RGAGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.69, which is higher than the MVCAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RGAGX and MVCAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RGAGXMVCAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.69

1.28

+0.42

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

0.44

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

0.51

+0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.85

0.45

+0.41

Drawdowns

RGAGX vs. MVCAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RGAGX drawdown since its inception was -36.19%, smaller than the maximum MVCAX drawdown of -60.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RGAGX and MVCAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RGAGXMVCAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.19%

-60.41%

+24.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.71%

-9.39%

-4.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.54%

-21.05%

-0.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.19%

-21.05%

-15.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.19%

-42.79%

+6.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.12%

-0.40%

-0.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.49%

-8.13%

+2.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.50%

2.75%

+0.75%

Volatility

RGAGX vs. MVCAX - Volatility Comparison

American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class R-6 (RGAGX) has a higher volatility of 3.86% compared to MFS Mid Cap Value Fund (MVCAX) at 3.44%. This indicates that RGAGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MVCAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RGAGXMVCAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.86%

3.44%

+0.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.66%

9.69%

+1.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.16%

13.40%

+1.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.24%

17.23%

+3.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.69%

19.26%

+0.43%

RGAGX vs. MVCAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RGAGX has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than MVCAX's 1.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

RGAGX vs. MVCAX - Dividend Comparison

RGAGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.05%, more than MVCAX's 7.55% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MVCAX
MFS Mid Cap Value Fund
7.55%8.21%10.99%2.73%5.22%5.70%0.80%2.03%6.36%3.36%0.07%4.59%
RGAGX
American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class R-6
10.05%10.99%9.29%7.70%4.44%8.49%4.57%7.93%12.36%7.34%6.95%9.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


RGAGX and MVCAX have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RGAGX has higher volatility (3.86%) compared to MVCAX (3.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RGAGX dropped -36.19% vs MVCAX's -60.41%.

RGAGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.69 vs 1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RGAGX and MVCAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer