PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RGA vs. RAMP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

RGA vs. RAMP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated (RGA) and LiveRamp Holdings, Inc. (RAMP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RGA achieves a 14.83% return, which is significantly lower than RAMP's 28.98% return.


RGA

1D
0.29%
1M
12.35%
6M
15.97%
YTD
14.83%
1Y
21.33%
3Y*
19.97%
5Y*
17.91%
10Y*
11.40%

RAMP

1D
0.26%
1M
0.69%
6M
35.77%
YTD
28.98%
1Y
17.79%
3Y*
10.73%
5Y*
-2.89%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RGA vs. RAMP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
RGA
Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated
14.83%-2.97%34.38%16.39%33.04%-3.21%-27.02%18.29%-0.06%
RAMP
LiveRamp Holdings, Inc.
28.98%-3.29%-19.83%61.60%-51.12%-34.49%52.26%24.44%-4.69%

Correlation

The correlation between RGA and RAMP is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2018

0.28

Fundamentals

Market Cap

RGA:

$15.14B

RAMP:

$2.30B

EPS

RGA:

$20.15

RAMP:

$1.46

PE Ratio

RGA:

11.47

RAMP:

25.90

PEG Ratio

RGA:

0.43

RAMP:

0.02

PS Ratio

RGA:

0.57

RAMP:

3.00

Total Revenue (TTM)

RGA:

$18.13B

RAMP:

$812.94M

Gross Profit (TTM)

RGA:

$3.15B

RAMP:

$574.82M

EBITDA (TTM)

RGA:

$1.46B

RAMP:

$97.51M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RGA vs. RAMP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RGA
RGA Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
RGA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RGA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
RGA Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
RGA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
RGA Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

RAMP
RAMP Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
RAMP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RAMP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
RAMP Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
RAMP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
RAMP Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RGA vs. RAMP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated (RGA) and LiveRamp Holdings, Inc. (RAMP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RGARAMPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.11

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.58

0.40

+1.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.78

0.81

+2.97

RGA vs. RAMP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RGA Sharpe Ratio is 0.84, which is higher than the RAMP Sharpe Ratio of 0.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RGA and RAMP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RGA vs. RAMP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RGA drawdown since its inception was -65.75%, smaller than the maximum RAMP drawdown of -81.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RGA and RAMP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RGARAMPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.75%

-81.83%

+16.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.68%

-33.13%

+20.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.11%

-48.19%

+21.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.11%

-72.71%

+45.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-65.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-55.93%

+55.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.64%

-48.38%

+36.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.30%

16.24%

-10.94%

Volatility

RGA vs. RAMP - Volatility Comparison

Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated (RGA) has a higher volatility of 6.22% compared to LiveRamp Holdings, Inc. (RAMP) at 1.60%. This indicates that RGA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RAMP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RGARAMPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.22%

1.60%

+4.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.21%

33.91%

-16.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.85%

44.68%

-20.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.67%

46.53%

-18.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.90%

48.04%

-15.14%

Dividends

RGA vs. RAMP - Dividend Comparison

RGA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.80%, while RAMP has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RAMP
LiveRamp Holdings, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RGA
Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated
1.80%1.79%1.63%2.04%2.15%2.61%2.42%1.59%1.57%1.17%1.24%1.64%

Financials

RGA vs. RAMP - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated and LiveRamp Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
6.49M
206.09M
(RGA) Total Revenue
(RAMP) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

RGA vs. RAMP - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated and LiveRamp Holdings, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober20260
70.6%
Portfolio components
RGA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 6.49M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

RAMP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, LiveRamp Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 145.54M and revenue of 206.09M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 70.6%.

RGA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated reported an operating income of 441.00K and revenue of 6.49M, resulting in an operating margin of 6.8%.

RAMP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, LiveRamp Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 15.29M and revenue of 206.09M, resulting in an operating margin of 7.4%.

RGA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated reported a net income of 331.00K and revenue of 6.49M, resulting in a net margin of 5.1%.

RAMP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, LiveRamp Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 19.26M and revenue of 206.09M, resulting in a net margin of 9.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


RGA and RAMP have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RGA has higher volatility (6.22%) compared to RAMP (1.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RGA dropped -65.75% vs RAMP's -81.83%.

RGA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.84 vs 0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RGA and RAMP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer